Hi folks, (I'm cc'ing the marketing team so they are aware of the issues here since it affects them too.) You might be aware of the Fedora.next initiative [1] led by Matt Miller and Stephen Gallagher, first presented at Flock this past summer. It hasn't affected our team much yet, but it will in a few months so I wanted to give you a heads up on how I think it will affect us and a rough plan of how I think we should look at tackling some of the things that are going to come up as a result. Just as a quick recap, Fedora.next involves splitting Fedora into three separate products: • Fedora Workstation • Fedora Server • Fedora Cloud What each of these 'products' will be, exactly, who they are targeting, and their various features, etc. is up to working groups that have been formed for each product. Information about the working groups is available at the following wiki pages per group: • Fedora Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation • Fedora Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server • Fedora Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud Those working groups will come up with product requirements by January 2014, at which point we'll have more information about each product and what it will be like. "Okay, so what does all of this have to do with the Fedora Design Team?" you may be wondering. Well, having more than one main 'product' for Fedora is going to result in our team - the main caretakers of the Fedora brand - having a lot of requests we aren't quite equipped to handle right now. Here's a few examples to show what I mean: • Can you design us a logo for our Fedora product? (What should each of the logos for these products look like? Should each product have its own logo?) • Can you make some artwork for our Fedora product? (What kind of artwork should be used to represent each? How can we give each product a distinctive feel but still keep all of the products coherently 'Fedora' looking in its branding so they look related / like a family?) • Can you add our product to the Fedora website? Can you make our product its own website? (How should we represent these products on the website? Should we allow products to have their own separate websites?) How do we answer these questions? How do we get on the same page about how to answer these questions? Ryan and I talked about this a little bit today, and we think that over time as these Fedora product plans solidify, as a team we'll need to come up with a 'brand framework' to support them all. (This sounds very fancy but it really isn't. I think it's just going to amount to some extensions to our current brand guidelines [2].) Well, all right - so where do we get started with that? Here's me and Ryan's thinking: • The Fedora brand is a strong brand, and we all collectively have invested a lot in it. The Fedora brand isn't going anywhere. • The products will all have a common core - Fedora. Their mission statements should, hopefully, derive in part from Fedora's overall mission statement of "leading the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community." The products' individual branding should reside under the umbrella of Fedora. We're talking different models of vehicle from Ford, where Ford is the overarching brand and each individual model of car has different target audiences and strengths, and *not* a model where boutique brands are spun up for each individual product (e.g., Lexus for high-end Toyotas, Scion for entry-level Gen-Y Toyota customers. [3]) • Since the products will be sub-brands under Fedora, we'll probably use one of the existing sublogo layouts [4] or design a new sublogo layout for them. • We can develop additional brand elements to extend the Fedora brand and help give each of the products their own visual identity within the main Fedora branding framework. What do I mean by brand elements? A very simple example would be to associate each product with a specific color: e.g., workstation is blue, server is green, cloud is yellow - or something like this. The wikipedia "Visual brand language" article [5] touches on this a little bit, especially with the example of the original Starbucks Visual Brand Language. • Specific brand framework elements we're thinking we'll need (much of which exists in our current brand framework): ∘ Logo, sublogos, and usage guidelines ∘ Visual brand langauge / brand element system ∘ Imagery: Illustration and Photography, guidelines for these ∘ Chart / Diagram / Table design and guidelines ∘ Voice: What is the Fedora 'sound' in written communication? • We'll probably need to review our current brand assets to verify whether or not they make sense given the changes we'll be making as well. E.g., will the four foundations still make sense? (Probably?) Cool, okay. So if that all makes sense - how do we develop these extensions onto the Fedora brand and build out our branding framework to be able to encompass multiple products? Here's a rough specific plan we came up with - the high level plan is basically to meet with the working groups initially to make sure they're thinking about some of the things we need to create these brand elements (e.g., mission statements, target audience, etc. so we know what and who we're designing for) and then once their product requirements (PRDs) are done, we can start mocking up some ideas with a better understanding of what these products are going to do and who they are for. Anyway, here's the timeline: • This week: Reach out to the various working groups and ask them a few basic questions: (1) What problem does your product solve, in one sentence? (2) Who is the target audience for your product, in one sentence? (3) List at least 5 products that successfully target the same target audience you are after. (4) List at least 5 products that try to solve the same problem. • This week: Blog all of this up for the wider Fedora community to read and provide feedback and ideas on. :) • Thursday, Nov 26: Deadline for the working groups to provide answers to our questions. • Monday, Dec 2: Set up meetings with each working group to gather some more information and details about target audience, purpose / mission statement, and competitive marketing. • January 2014: PRDs are due • Februrary 2014: Start some work on extending the Fedora brand framework. What do you think? Does this make sense? Do you want to get involved? Everyone here is more than welcome to help out with this as you'd like if you think it makes sense. Just reply to this thread or let's chat in #fedora-design. Whatever works! ~m [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines [3] This may be a North Americanism, but hopefully you get the gist. [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines#Fedora_Sub-Logos:_Sta... [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_brand_language _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

On 11/14/2013 06:41 AM, Adam Saunders wrote: > While we could use different colours to differentiate the products, I > think sticking with the same/similar shades of blue of the Fedora logo > could be more effective. It might better illustrate that the products > are all part of the Fedora project. I think this is definitely worth a try, to give each a distinctive look while keep blue the common color - we can see if it works. > The Ford example also sounds good; Ford cars all have a common logo with > differentiating sublogos. However, there can be striking differences > between those sublogos: the Ford Mustang's is a galloping stallion, > while the Ford Taurus's is a sharp word mark. While the Starbucks visual > brand language has many clear commonalities, Ford automobile sublogos > look very different from each other. Well, the galloping stallion is actually a mark / badge / insignia, not the logo. On the website and official brochures (I can speak to the latter because I own a Ford and was recently at the dealer for a tune up :) ) the 'MUSTANG' logo is written out in the same font as the other cars' logos. But I am glad you pointed that out because that might be a point of confusion in our analogy; we might need to find a better one when explaining this. We definitely want clear commonalities between any marks or visual identity graphics we create for the different products! > I guess my point is: I think we should add these questions to the list > to ask the working groups: > > (5) To what extent is your product different from > the other products in the Fedora.next initiative? > > (6) To what extent is your product similar to the other > products in the Fedora.next initiative? > > These may be somewhat trivial-sounding questions, but getting a sense of > how the working groups see their product in relation to the other > Fedora.next products could help to better establish a common branding > framework. This is a good point; I think though, we'll probably find the differences clear through the answers to their other questions maybe? Mainly, the 'what problem does it solve' question should differentiate them enough do you think? ~m _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

Hi folks, On 11/13/2013 05:01 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > What do you think? Does this make sense? Do you want to get involved? > Everyone here is more than welcome to help out with this as you'd like > if you think it makes sense. Just reply to this thread or let's chat in > #fedora-design. Whatever works! Just as an update, I put together a wiki page to organize this effort: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Design/Fedora.next_Brand I linked it up on the main Design wiki page under 'Current Projects.' ~m _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team