I'd rather it wasn't included at all, personally. ----- Original Message ----- > Hi folks! So an F24 beta blocker was proposed today: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330941 > > because devassistant is not in F24 Workstation, and we have a criterion > requiring that all 'core applications' listed at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Technical_Specification#Core_A... > must be present. > > Now you might note that devassistant isn't in that now, so what's the > problem? It's not in it because I just took it out :) > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Workstation/Technical_Specifi... > > There was a meeting last year where its removal was agreed by the WG: > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/workstation/workstation.2015-11-2... > > but no-one updated the tech spec. There is an outstanding question, > however. It seemed from the meeting that people might want to keep > including the CLI, but in fact, the main 'devassistant' metapackage was > removed from comps: > > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/commit/?id=3ba95e811800f0dd54... > > so no part of DA is in current Workstation composes. I don't know if > you want to do anything about that. But I felt it was at least > sufficiently clear that DA was no longer considered a 'core > application' for Workstation and thus we don't need to block the Beta > on it not being present. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org

Matthew Miller píše v Čt 28. 04. 2016 v 08:33 -0400: I wonder how we can make the Fedora Developer Portal more visible in Fedora. When the article about refined look was published quite a few ppl complained it's difficult to find out that something like this even exists. Maybe as a bookmark in Firefox? But I rarely check out pre-installed bookmarks. Maybe as a webapp? Jiri

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 12:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: In GNOME 3.20 we now have support for system-installed web apps. We could tuck these under a desktop folder (same as we currently have for Sundry and Utilities) if we really wanted to. But TBH I think it would be best to just feature them more prominently on start.fedoraproject.org. Michael

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Jiri Eischmann <eischmann(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Links on getfedora.org? Something like "Start developing on Fedora today! See this!"?

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:39:17PM +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Another, radically unorthodox, approach would involve to fill it with original, high-quality content. Non-trivial stuff that you can't already get from the manpage or a simple DNF or web search. As it is, there's just not that much of it there.