On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:04 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
I'm replying to an old thread; see below. Is there any chance we can get
pam-keyring in by default for Fedora 8? If yes, how about creating a
Wiki page for the feature much like the ones Matthias created for other
F8 bound features as mentioned here
so we can track the progress and everyone can get an overview of what
work is required etc. Thanks!
Top men are on it! Well, as soon as the wiki isn't deathly slow from all
the downloads. I am also working on getting a Trac instance up for
pam_keyring. I am hoping I will finally have the time this weekend to
get everything up and ready for public consumption.
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:01 +0100, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 08:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 04:36 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> "PAM_KEYRING is a pam module that launches the
> gnome-keyring-daemon and
> > >> then unlocks a keyring using your login password."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > +1
> > We have two bugs open against pam_keyring now both of which are
> > important to fix if we need to put this in by default. CC'ing the
> > current upstream and Fedora maintainer
> > * Should have an automated way to enable -
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232857
> > * Make it possible to change keyring password -
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212845
> > The first bug probably can fixed by adding rpm post installation
> > scripts. The second bug currently requiring patching gnome-keyring.
> Well you guys caught me at a good time. I am on vacation this week and
> one of the things I had planned was to finally push the next version of
> pam_keyring. This version will have password changing support in it and
> should close bug #212845.
> I also started working on mockups of system-config-authentication that
> include a tab that would detect if you had pam_keyring or pam_ssh was
> available and add check boxes to enable it at graphical login. Maybe I
> will spend and hour or two and finish that up. Does that sound like a
> good solution for bug #232857?