Help needed with latex/R doc font issue
by Orion Poplawski
I'm trying to update R-lmtest to the latest release, but am having
trouble during the documentation build step:
* checking PDF version of manual ...
ERROR
LaTeX errors when creating PDF version.
This typically indicates Rd problems.
LaTeX errors found:
! Package textcomp Error: Symbol \textcurrency not provided by
(textcomp) font family ptm in TS1 encoding.
(textcomp) Default family used instead.
See the textcomp package documentation for explanation.
Now, the shipped docs are in ISO-8599 encoding, so I convert the to
UTF-8 with:
for x in lmtest/man/*.Rd
do
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 < ${x} | tr -d '\r' > ${x}.utf-8
touch -r ${x} ${x}.utf-8
mv ${x}.utf-8 ${x}
done
This worked fine the last time I built the package (2008-06-25 for F-10).
If I take out the iconv step, the documentation builds fine. Seems like
a tex font is not getting installed that needs to be?
BuildRequires: R-devel, tetex-latex, R-zoo
Mock root contains:
DEBUG util.py:250: fontconfig x86_64 2.6.0-3.fc10
fedora 183 k
DEBUG util.py:250: fontconfig-devel x86_64 2.6.0-3.fc10
fedora 216 k
DEBUG util.py:250: ghostscript-fonts noarch 5.50-19.fc10
fedora 812 k
DEBUG util.py:250: libXfont x86_64 1.3.3-1.fc10
fedora 232 k
DEBUG util.py:250: libfontenc x86_64 1.0.4-6.fc10
fedora 24 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-fonts noarch 2007-5.fc11
fedora 3.7 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-fonts noarch 2007-26.fc10
fedora 56 M
DEBUG util.py:250: urw-fonts noarch 2.4-6.fc10
fedora 3.2 M
DEBUG util.py:250: xorg-x11-font-utils x86_64 1:7.2-6.fc10
fedora 79 k
DEBUG util.py:250: tex-preview noarch 11.85-7.fc9
fedora 52 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texinfo x86_64 4.13a-1.fc11
fedora 885 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive x86_64 2007-39.fc11
fedora 2.2 M
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-dvips x86_64 2007-39.fc11
fedora 197 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-latex x86_64 2007-39.fc11
fedora 82 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf noarch 2007-26.fc10
fedora 3.5 M
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-dvips noarch 2007-26.fc10
fedora 378 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata noarch 2007-5.fc11
fedora 3.6 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-dvips noarch 2007-5.fc11
fedora 3.6 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-fonts noarch 2007-5.fc11
fedora 3.7 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-latex noarch 2007-5.fc11
fedora 3.7 k
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-fonts noarch 2007-26.fc10
fedora 56 M
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-latex noarch 2007-26.fc10
fedora 6.0 M
DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-utils x86_64 2007-39.fc11
fedora 236 k
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
15 years, 1 month
Fedora 11 Mass Rebuild Status
by Jesse Keating
Well the initial pass of the rebuild has finished!
6217 completed builds. Of those 6117 need to be tagged.
Down to 450 failed builds that need attention.
512 builds that still need to be done or otherwise accounted for (like
dead packages that haven't been blocked).
76 failures in the build submission path that need to be examined.
Extremely impressive for 4~ days of work.
In just a few minutes I'll be kicking off the tag submissions, which
will likely completely overload the buildsystem for at least an hour,
although I'm just guessing. We've never submitted this many tag
requests with this many active builders with their new algorithms for
taking tasks. The tag requests should be without email to save some
spam. Syncing rawhide tomorrow will be quite slow and painful.
I'll post a raw unbuilt list to go along with our failure list a little
later today and I'll be working through the packages that didn't quite
make it through the submission process. All in all though I'd consider
this quite successful!
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
15 years, 1 month
Packages hardcoded to build 'i386'
by Jesse Keating
Since we now build i586, packages that are hardcoded to build i386 will
not produce a build. I just so happened to have a checkout of
everything and ran a little suggested grep to find such problems. Not
many of them, but I don't have the time today to look through them.
Anybody want to give it a shot?
http://fpaste.org/paste/4675
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
15 years, 1 month
Re: Two Python packages seek loving maintainers
by Adam Miller
I would be interested in both. If you orphan them in pkgdb, I will go ahead
and pick them up and I'm a big fan of upstream involvement :)
-Adam
(From my G1)
On Feb 26, 2009 7:34 PM, "Andrew Price" <andy(a)andrewprice.me.uk> wrote:
I find myself in a position which leaves me little opportunity for
taking care of my Fedora packages at the moment. I have two packages,
- pybackpack: a Gnome GUI backup program, and
- python-twyt: a Twitter API library and commandline client
which I would like to request assistance with, or somebody willing to
take over one, or both of them.
I'm the upstream developer for both packages so you will have my full
cooperation and attention if/when any issues arise which require
upstream attention. Searching bugzilla returns "zarro boogs" for both
packages, so they're either well-written, or rarely-used *ahem* :-)
They're still both in active development so bugs will get fixed upstream
and I'll still take an active interest in how they're progressing in
Fedora but I won't get in the way of the new maintainers.
Any takers?
--
Andy Price
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
15 years, 1 month
Rebuild dependency issue
by Orion Poplawski
Just saw this in the plplot build failure:
DEBUG util.py:256: hal-0.5.12-21.20090226git.fc11.i586 from build has
depsolving problems
DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: dmidecode >= 2.7 is needed
by package hal-0.5.12-21.20090226git.fc11.i586 (build)
DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: dmidecode >= 2.7 is
needed by package hal-0.5.12-21.20090226git.fc11.i586 (build)
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
15 years, 1 month
Fedora 11 Mass Rebuilds
by Jesse Keating
In just a few minutes, I will begin the scripted rebuild of every Fedora
package in rawhide (dist-f11). See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild for details.
Most importantly, if you as a maintainer wish to build your own package
for this rebuild instead of having the script do it, follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild#How_do_I_opt_out_of...
The script will be doing things one package at a time, so even though
the script will be starting in a few minutes (and it'll be working
alphanumerically in descending order), you still have a window to
opt-out of the build before the script gets to your package.
I will be announcing the progress of the rebuilds over the next few
days. It is important to note that the results of the rebuilds will not
be showing up in rawhide (and koji buildroots) immediately. Instead
they will be contained on the side until the script is finished building
things, and they will be tagged into rawhide (dist-f11) en masse.
If your build was started after 2009-02-23 18:31:07 UTC, the script will
not touch your package, as that is after all the proper parts were in
place for this rebuild.
Let the games begin!
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
15 years, 1 month
