May 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Miroslav Suchý

I just released new `mock-core-configs` and there is a new feature. It contains: $ ls -l /etc/mock ... lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 26 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-aarch64.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 25 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-armhfp.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-armhfp.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 23 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-i386.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-i386.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 24 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-ppc64.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-ppc64.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 26 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-ppc64le.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-ppc64le.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 24 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-s390x.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-s390x.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock 25 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-x86_64.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg The plan is that during Fedora branching event I will: * remove those symlinks and create regular files pointing to Fedora 29 repos * create fedora-30-* as symlinks to fedora-rawhide-* This will give you a choice to target rawhide using "rawhide" string or using the number. Miroslav Suchy

5 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

libicu upgrade to 61.1 with soname bump in rawhide/F29

by Eike Rathke

Hi, I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds, I'll ask Pete Walter (who already did it for 60.1) to help with rebuilding the dependent packages, or another proven packager if he's not available. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A Care about Free Software, support the FSFE https://fsfe.org/support/?erack

5 years, 11 months

3
3
0 / 0

Fedora 28 is officially here!

by Matthew Miller

It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, which is officially released today. Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly smooth and polished release. You all are awesome. Read the official announcement at: * https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-28/ or just go ahead and grab it from: * https://getfedora.org/ -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

5 years, 11 months

8
8
0 / 0

Review request: battray

by Globe Trotter

Hi, Would someone be willing to review a simple package for me? The BZ is here: Bug 1573695 – Review Request: Battray - simple tray icon to show a laptop’s battery status. I have some experience with Fedora's packaging and have maintained a few packages (pdf-stapler, python-PDF2, sylfilter) for a while. Happy to reciprocate as needed. FAS username: aarem | | | | Bug 1573695 – Review Request: Battray - simple tray icon to show a lapto... | | |

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Orphaning schroot package

by Zach Carter

I'm orphaning the schroot package, since I no longer use it or work with it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/schroot There is currently a serious (crash) bug affecting the package in F28: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573253 Upstream: https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=schroot

5 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

Fedora 28-20180426.n.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 231763 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231763 ID: 231799 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231799 ID: 231807 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231807 ID: 231808 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231808 ID: 231823 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231823 ID: 231855 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231855 ID: 231907 Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231907 ID: 231914 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231914 ID: 231923 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231923 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 231771 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231771 ID: 231785 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231785 ID: 231786 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231786 ID: 231810 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231810 ID: 231847 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231847 ID: 231876 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231876 ID: 231894 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231894 ID: 231895 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231895 Passed openQA tests: 127/137 (x86_64), 18/24 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 163 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Should boost package install boost-python2 / boost-python3 / both or none?

by Miro Hrončok

I was recently surprised that `dnf install boost` brings in python2. It is like that because boost brings in bost-python and that is python2 ATM. I've reported it as a bug, because it bugs me :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569483 However Jonathan Wakely (the boost maintainer) says this needs broader audience. So I'm asking here on devel: Should the 'boost' metapackage install boost-python at all? If so, what versions? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

5 years, 11 months

4
6
0 / 0

Re: Working on a Dracut bug?

by Matthew Miller

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:32:36PM +0200, inderaue23(a)arcor.de wrote: > btw. just read that fedora workstation doesn't need a separate root > account anymore. there are no security concerns i should have, don't > i? You can set a root password if you like. You might find this bit I wrote a while ago for Stack Exchange to be helpful: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/8588/2511 -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Working on a Dracut bug?

by Matthew Miller

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:30:19PM +0200, inderaue23(a)arcor.de wrote: > now ist 1st of may. And Fedora 28 is released. I want do upgrade. But i don't want this error messages and related start up issues anymore. > Is there any progress on fixing this long term issue? We're working on it, and trying to find the best solution. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180426.n.0 changes

by Fedora Branched Report

OLD: Fedora-28-20180425.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180426.n.0 ===== SUMMARY ===== Added images: 0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages: 0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages: 0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B ===== ADDED IMAGES ===== ===== DROPPED IMAGES ===== ===== ADDED PACKAGES ===== ===== DROPPED PACKAGES ===== ===== UPGRADED PACKAGES ===== ===== DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =====

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel May 2018