package name and spec name missmatch
by Muneendra Kumar M
Hi All,
An rpm package has been created by name fctxpd.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd
But my spec file name and the name field in my spec file is fc_txptd.
And my SRPM also has the name with fc_txptd.
And I push the SRPM with fc_txptd because of which fedpkg build is failing.
fedpkg import PATH_TO_SRPM
git commit -m "Initial import (#XXXXXX)."
git push
fedpkg build
Do I need to create a new SRPM with fctxpd and push the same again to git.
Will this resolve my issue.
Any help here will be great.
Regards,
Muneendra.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mattia Verga via devel [mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 12:59 PM
To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Mattia Verga <mattia.verga(a)protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement
Il 03/09/19 01:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>
> It seems in testing ok on the master mirrors...
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/30/Every
> thing/SRPMS/Packages/s/skychart-4.1.1-5.4000svn.fc30.src.rpm
>
Interesting, so the package IS in the mirrors, but metadata doesn't track
it. If I disable fedora-modular repo I get no sign of the update nor the
previous version which is in stable:
# dnf list skychart --enablerepo=updates-testing Ultima verifica della
scadenza dei metadati: 0:01:32 fa il mar 3 set 2019, 09:24:09.
Errore: Nessun pacchetto corrispondente
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an
email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
4 years, 7 months
fedpkg push output
by Muneendra Kumar M
Hi All,
When I run the fedpkg push iam getting the below o/p .
Can anyone tell me is everything fine with the fedpkg push operation.
git commit -sm "Initial import (#1735762)"
[master ba1a11d] Initial import (#1735762)
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .gitignore
create mode 100644 fc_txptd.spec
create mode 100644 sources
[muneendra@dhcp-10-122-54-198 fctxpd]$fedpkg push
Enumerating objects: 6, done.
Counting objects: 100% (6/6), done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done.
Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 1.43 KiB | 732.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 5 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Emitting a message to the fedmsg bus.
remote: * Publishing information for 1 commits
remote: Traceback (most recent call last):
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pagure/hooks/__init__.py",
line 394, in run_project_hooks
remote: changes=changes,
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pagure/hooks/__init__.py",
line 111, in runhook
remote: changes=changes,
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pagure/hooks/default.py",
line 421, in post_receive
remote: but_uids=pr_uids,
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/celery/local.py", line
191, in __call__
remote: return self._get_current_object()(*a, **kw)
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/celery/app/task.py", line
375, in __call__
remote: return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
remote: File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pagure/lib/tasks_utils.py", line 36, in
decorated_function
remote: return function(self, session, *args, **kwargs)
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pagure/lib/tasks.py", line
696, in refresh_pr_cache
remote: session, project, but_uids=but_uids
remote: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pagure/lib/query.py", line
3411, in reset_status_pull_request
remote: {model.PullRequest.merge_status: None},
synchronize_session=False
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line 2796, in
update
remote: update_op.exec_()
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/persistence.py", line
897, in exec_
remote: self._do_exec()
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/persistence.py", line
995, in _do_exec
remote: update_stmt, params=self.query._params)
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 991,
in execute
remote: bind, close_with_result=True).execute(clause, params or {})
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/base.py", line 729,
in execute
remote: return meth(self, multiparams, params)
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/sql/elements.py", line 322,
in _execute_on_connection
remote: return connection._execute_clauseelement(self, multiparams,
params)
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/base.py", line 826,
in _execute_clauseelement
remote: compiled_sql, distilled_params
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/base.py", line 958,
in _execute_context
remote: context)
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/base.py", line 1159,
in _handle_dbapi_exception
remote: exc_info
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/util/compat.py", line 199,
in raise_from_cause
remote: reraise(type(exception), exception, tb=exc_tb)
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/base.py", line 951,
in _execute_context
remote: context)
remote: File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/default.py", line
436, in do_execute
remote: cursor.execute(statement, parameters)
remote: ProgrammingError: (ProgrammingError) permission denied for relation
pull_requests
remote: 'UPDATE pull_requests SET merge_status=%(merge_status)s,
last_updated=%(last_updated)s WHERE pull_requests.project_id =
%(project_id_1)s AND pull_requests.status = %(status_1)s' {'project_id_1':
38194, 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 9, 3, 6, 2, 47, 584633),
'merge_status': None, 'status_1': u'Open'}
remote: Sending to redis to log activity and send commit notification emails
remote: * Publishing information for 1 commits
To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd
5dc1c76..ba1a11d master -> master
[muneendra@dhcp-10-122-54-198 fctxpd]
Regards,
Muneendra.
4 years, 7 months
How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?
by Steven A. Falco
The upstream KiCAD project has requested that I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS from the Fedora package, as described here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1838448
What is the best way to do that? I can add "%undefine _hardened_build" (which I am testing now) but I think that will remove other hardening features that I might want to leave enabled.
Steve
4 years, 7 months
f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)
by Kaleb Keithley
`dnf update` on my f32/rawhide machine is giving me:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
bat:latest:3120190714171319:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64
Problem 2: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
exa:latest:3120190721165838:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64
Problem 3: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
libgit2:0.28:3120190714114509:f636be4b-0.x86_64
Problem 4: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module
silver:rolling:3120190728135623:22d7e2a5-0.x86_64
What do I need to do for this?
Thanks,
--
Kaleb
4 years, 7 months
Sponsorship request
by David Kaufmann
Hi!
I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's
orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long)
I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the
FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so I'm looking for a sponsor via this list.
Technically this is also a self-introduction, as I've never introduced
myself on this list. I've been part of the fedora security team since
sometime in 2015 and am subscribed to this list since sometime in 2016,
but it was never necessary for me to maintain packages myself, and I
didn't really participate in the discussions.
I'm currently student and teach network security as study assistant.
Next to that I'm working as a system administrator in a research group
running almost exclusively fedora as operating system. :)
Thanks,
Astra
(David Kaufmann)
4 years, 7 months
[HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag
by Miro Hrončok
Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.8, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a
side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
If you see a "Rebuild for Python 3.8" commit in your package, please don't
rebuild it in regular rawhide.
If you need to, please let me know, so we can coordinate.
If you'd like to update the package, you should be able to build it in the side
tag via:
on branch master:
$ fedpkg build --target=f32-python
Note that it will take a while before the essential packages are rebuilt, so
don't except all your dependencies to be available right away.
Thanks. Let us know if you have any questions.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
4 years, 7 months
