Adding Medical SIG package group and including bio-tech, biology
by Jun Aruga
Hi,
There are 3 topics for the Fedora Medical SIG in this email.
## Creating RPM group: medical-sig
I would like to add "medical-sig" to the RPM groups that is listed on
the page below.
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups
Someone do you know how to create the group?
## Including bio-tech to Medical SIG
Seeing the SIG's wiki page, right now Medical SIG is for
Doctor/Dentist's healthcare system specific.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/FedoraMedical
I want to update the Medical SIG's wiki page including bio-tech,
biology content.
In my opinion, a challenge for the medical, biology communities is the
sustainability.
Each medical and bio package maintainer in Fedora tends to manage
their RPM packages in individual level.
I want to make the Medical SIG the inclusive place the place to
communicate and work collaboratively for the RPM packages.
A good role model for the concept of Medical SIG is Debian Med team.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed
> The Debian Med project prepares packages that are associated with medicine, pre-clinical research, and life sciences. Its developments are mostly focused on three areas for the moment: medical practice, imaging and bioinformatics.
I want to adapt the concept to Fedora Medical SIG.
https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/
Biology is the sub category of the Medical in the Debian Med project.
Well, for example working for creating a yogurt that has a strength
for the disease sequencing the yogurt bacteria genome is not medical.
But aligning with Debian Medical project is still meaningful for me.
Any thoughts?
## Promotion!
If you are interested in Medical/Biology, please join us to Medical SIG!
It's a very moderate traffic group right now.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/medical-sig@lists.fedorahos...
=> Manage subscription
Mailing list address: medical-sig(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Cheers,
Jun
--
Jun | He - His - Him
4 years, 1 month
Help with gcc10-arm-only problem
by Sergio Pascual
Hi list, I'm trying to fix this problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799588
It built in previous releases, so I assume is gcc 10 related
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41318599
The package build in all arches except in arm an the error is:
/builddir/build/BUILD/libindi-1.8.1/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp: In
member function 'bool INDI::Telescope::processTimeInfo(const char*, const
char*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/libindi-1.8.1/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp:1647:17:
error: 'stime' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'ctime'?
1647 | stime(&raw_time);
| ^~~~~
| ctime
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/indidriverstatic.dir/build.make:352:
CMakeFiles/indidriverstatic.dir/libs/indibase/inditelescope.cpp.o] Error 1
For some reason, stime works in all arches except in arm. Any hint?
Thank you, Sergio
4 years, 1 month
Fedora 32 compose report: 20200301.n.0 changes
by Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200301.n.0
===== SUMMARY =====
Added images: 0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages: 0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages: 0 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B
===== ADDED IMAGES =====
===== DROPPED IMAGES =====
===== ADDED PACKAGES =====
===== DROPPED PACKAGES =====
===== UPGRADED PACKAGES =====
===== DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =====
4 years, 1 month
Forge discussion: FSF project effect?
by Adam Williamson
Hey folks!
So, I caught an interesting story on LWN today:
https://lwn.net/Articles/813254/
it appears the FSF is planning to run a forge and contribute to
whatever project they use, and Pagure is currently their leading
contender:
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Fsf_2019_forge_evaluation
"Pagure (seems most likely, its our current focus)"
were we aware of this? Is it feeding into the forge evaluation at all?
Given that resource constraints seem to be a significant factor,
presumably having some resources contributed by FSF would be rather
useful...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
4 years, 1 month
