January 2022 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Jerry James

Happy New Year! I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack: - ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160 - ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395 - ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396 - ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398 - ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399 Let me know what I can review for you. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

2 years, 3 months

4
5
0 / 0

kTLS related failures on rawhide in OpenSSL 3.0.1

by Sahana Prasad

Hello everyone, Could anyone kindly help with investigating the kTLS related failures in [1] They could be infrastructure related issues, the right kernel versions that support kTLS. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/pull-request/19 Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad

2 years, 3 months

3
4
0 / 0

Retired: system-config-repo

by Alec Leamas

Dear list, I have retired system-config-repo. This is something I should have done long ago. I did the upstream as a basically failed experiment, and I doubt anyone will miss it. When it now failed to build I finally got my finger out. --alec

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Koji issue: tagBuild tasks failing - don't panic too much

by Adam Williamson

Hi folks! So, you may have noticed that some package builds in Koji recently are being reported as failed because the `tagBuild` task - which happens at the end of a successful build - "failed". The error reported is that the build was already tagged. This shouldn't be happening - the builds definitely weren't tagged before the task ran. We've been looking into it this morning and have filed an issue on Koji for the devs to look into: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/3220 So hopefully we'll be able to resolve it reasonably soon. For package builds, this is ultimately only a cosmetic error. The tag operation does actually work. The package build has effectively completed successfully - the build was tagged and will be in future composes. The task shows as failed in Koji, but you can ignore this. For composes this is a bigger problem, as we're getting this error on image builds (yes, these get tagged, no, I didn't know either!) and it causes composes to fail if a blocking image hits this bug. We'll be re- running composes that fail on this bug until it can be resolved. Sorry for the trouble! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Self Introduction: Ali Yousefi Sabzevar

by Ali Yousefi Sabzevar

Dear fellows, This is Ali. Long time Open Source user since FC4 (Fedora Core 4), but also worked with main debian based distros too. I work specially with Fedora, CentOS/RHEL and Ansible. It's been a few days since I found v (vlang) very interesting. I found out that the rpm package is not available on fedora repo. I thought it's a good time to contribute by building the RPM package of a promising programming language. Any constructive suggestion is highly appreciated. Regards, Ali Yousefi Sabzevar

2 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

F36 Change: Cockpit File Sharing (Late Self-Contained Change proposal)

by Ben Cotton

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cockpit-file-sharing-2-4-1-5 == Summary == A cockpit module to make file sharing with Samba and NFS easier. == Owner == * Name: [[User:PBoy| Peter Boy]], [[User:sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]], [[User:salimma| Michel Salim]] on behalf of Fedora Server WG * Email: <pboy(a)uni-bremen.de> == Detailed Description == Provides an improved graphical web-based interface for provisioning and ongoing administration of NFS and Samba shares. It thus complements the standard Fedora Server command line interface. == Benefit to Fedora == Significantly improves usability for Fedora Server Edition administrators when deploying and maintaining NFS and Samba shares. It thus makes Fedora Server Edition more attractive for use as a file server, especially for new users without extensive experience with Fedora. It thus helps to expand our user base. == Scope == * Proposal owners: The package has already landed in the F36 repo now (and is available in updates-testing for stable Fedora, EPEL 8 and EPEL 9). No further action required * Other developers: * Release engineering: none * Policies and guidelines: N/A * Trademark approval: N/A * Alignment with Objectives: == Upgrade/compatibility impact == N/A == How To Test == * Install Fedora Server Edition on supported hardware (no special requirements but network connectivity) * Prepare a Linux Client Workstation ready to mount NFS share * Prepare a Windows or MacOS client ready to mount a Windows share * On Workstation connect to server Cockpit and follow the Web interface guidance to create a NFS share and a Samba share * Use Linux and Windows desktop accordingly to connect to the server using the respective standard procedures == User Experience == The interface serves as a guide for carrying out the required steps and independently performs necessary follow-up actions based on the user declarations. New users or users with little routine are provided with simple and error-free server administration, while experienced administrators are spared a lot of typing work. The user interface provides guidance to == Dependencies == none == Contingency Plan == * Contingency mechanism: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change) == Documentation == N/A (online guidance) -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-01-20 17:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2022-01-20 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2022-01-20 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2022-01-20 12:00 EST --> US/Eastern <-- 2022-01-20 17:00 GMT Europe/London 2022-01-20 17:00 UTC UTC 2022-01-20 18:00 CET Europe/Berlin 2022-01-20 18:00 CET Europe/Paris 2022-01-20 22:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2022-01-21 01:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2022-01-21 01:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2022-01-21 02:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2022-01-21 03:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Actions = #topic #pr-814 * mhroncok talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot = Followup Issues = #topic #886 Enable BRP for detecting RPATH .fpc 886 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/886 #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #1058 How to handle %lang files in package owned directories? .fpc 1058 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1058 #topic #1132 Mark comments as scriplets for Sources (automation) .fpc 1132 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1132 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 #topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045 #topic #pr-1046 Improve separate test suite sourcing instructions https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1046 #topic #pr-1071 Overhaul the RPATH section of the guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1071 #topic #pr-1097 Use caret in Obsoletes to simplify https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1097 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

hiredis soname bump

by Kevin Fenzi

Greetings. We currently have hiredis-0.13.3-16 in rawhide, I'd like to upgrade to 1.0.2, which includes a soname bump. I plan to make a side tag and build dependent packages the next few days. I've rebuilt everything in a copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kevin/hiredis/builds/ The two failures were rsyslog and opensips, but they both fail the same way in rawhide. dependent packages are: alexandria ccache collectd coturn gawk-redis gearmand icecat idzebra minetest minetestmapper opensips php-phpiredis rsyslog sems seqan3 subtitleeditor suricata syslog-ng tellico yaz zmap kevin

2 years, 3 months

6
8
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220120.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220119.0): ID: 1109331 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1109331 ID: 1109340 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1109340 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220120.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220119.0): ID: 1109257 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1109257 ID: 1109266 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1109266 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel January 2022