devel

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

85 participants
64689 discussions

Non-responsive maintainer check for spot
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459162 My PR for 'julius' package is now 5 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer.

2 2

Non-responsive maintainer check for mystro256
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459177 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459178 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459179 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459180 My PRs for those packages are 4 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer.

2 1

Way too much automated email on this list
by Kashyap Chamarthy 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Hi folks, There is way too much automated email on this list. It's getting ridiculous. I say this as a 'power user' who is no stranger to very high-traffic lists. Today I had to add this "hook" to my main client (Mutt) to will hide the automated gunk from view. So I can at least skim the damn list! folder-hook Fedora/devel 'limit ! (~s "ELN Report" | ~s "Branched Report" | ~s "Rawhide Report" | ~s "compose" | ~s "Meeting")' (I know, I might miss some precious discussion that could branch out from these mails. It's a tiny cost to pay for the skimmability gains.) If we don't fix this deluge, expect non-power users of lists to drop out drastically. Only a handful of those who configured their setup to hell and back[1] might remain. * * * How about creating a 'fedora-notifications' or 'fedora-reports' list and redirect them all there? Or a weekly "digest" with relevant links and reports in a _single_ email. I'm on this list to read what other _humans_ are talking about! I may soon have to start feeding an 'mbox' of this list to a local LLM to get a digest of it. [1] https://xkcd.com/1782/ Regards, Kashyap

9 11

Non-responsive maintainer check for rstrode
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459165 My PR for 'gtk2' package was 5 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer. Today it got merged by Neal Gompa.

2 1

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for rhughes
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

W dniu 17.04.2026 o 14:24, Richard Hughes pisze:> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 1:03 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz > <mjuszkiewicz(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459166 My PR >> for 'gtk2' package was 5 months old. Not a single comment from the >> maintainer. > Well, I'm here and very active in Fedora -- I'm also not the gtk2 > maintainer, mclasen is. I asked on devel channel in matrix and was told to start it against anyone listed in package members. > I'm not really sure what you're trying to achieve; are you trying to > invoke the "non-responsive maintainer policy" for everyone in the > commit group (that are not the maintainer of the package) just to > get your riscv patches merged faster? If so, that's really bad -- > and you need to stop right now. I am aware that gtk2 is a package kept because there are still some legacy programs which someone may use. And have no upstream changes etc. But five months for a change which take a minute to review?

1 0

Non-responsive maintainer check for alexl
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459168 My PR for 'gtk2' package was 5 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer. Today it got merged by Neal Gompa.

1 0

Non-responsive maintainer check for aekoroglu
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459182 My PR for 'arm-compute-library' package was 2 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer. Today, Neal Gompa merged it.

1 0

Non-responsive maintainer check for julian8628
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459176 My PR for 'ursa-major' package is 4 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer.

1 0

Non-responsive maintainer check for mkasik
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459169 My PR for 'gtk2' package was 5 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer. Today it got merged by Neal Gompa.

1 0

Non-responsive maintainer check for rhughes
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 17 Apr '26

17 Apr '26

Filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459166 My PR for 'gtk2' package was 5 months old. Not a single comment from the maintainer. Today it got merged by Neal Gompa.

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel