On Jul 19, 2013 2:11 PM, "Steve Clark" <sclark@netwolves.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/19/2013 02:56 PM, "Jóhann B. Guđmundsson" wrote:
>>
>> On 07/19/2013 06:45 PM, Billy Crook wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't seen anyone asking to ship two sysloggers.
>>
>>
>> I perhaps should have been clearer and say "two logging systems" which
>> we currently are doing and one of those cannot be disabled or removed so
>> the logical choice is to remove the one that can and make him as an
>> option to be install later.
>>
>> JBG
>
> This might have merit if the one you want to keep could do everything it does
> plus what the one you want to remove does.

Well put.   This is exactly why NoSyslog is premature.