Dne 15. 09. 21 v 12:57 Petr Menšík napsal(a):
Hi Sahana,
it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to
watch the progress.
The commit message should contain reference to the change proposal IMO
Vít
Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a new release, I
am preparing update for it, but I am not sure where should I watch for
a progress. Even build of openssl itself does not reference any bug.
Is there any better tracker than bug #1825937, which I can monitor for
progress? Is the koji build the best way to check readiness? Does
exist any variant of RHEL9 bug #1958021
<
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958021> for Fedora Rawhide?
Is there any expected timeline, how long it might take to merge the
side-tag?
Thanks!
Regards,
Petr
On 9/14/21 6:56 PM, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The builds of packages that depend on OpenSSL are being rebuilt in
> the side tag f36-build-side-44794 [1] now.
>
> Note to package maintainers: If you see a "Rebuilt with OpenSSL
> 3.0.0" commit in your package, do not build it in
> regular rawhide unless the side tag is merged
>
> [1]
>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=44794&am...
>
<
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=44794&am...
>
>
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Sahana Prasad
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:06 PM Sahana Prasad <sahana(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:sahana@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:35 PM Omair Majid <omajid(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:omajid@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sahana Prasad <sahana(a)redhat.com <mailto:sahana@redhat.com>>
> writes:
>
> > An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0
> final RC
> > (released upstream yesterday)
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>
> I read the upstream announcement and it certainly reads like
> it's the
> final/GA release, not an RC:
>
>
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2021/09/07/OpenSSL3.Final/
> <
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2021/09/07/OpenSSL3.Final/>
>
> Do you know what's going on? Did they phrase it badly or did they
> perform multiple releases in parallel?
>
>
> Hi Omair,
>
> Sorry I phrased it incorrectly. It is the final major version
> only, not the RC.
>
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Sahana Prasad
>
>
> Thanks,
> Omair
>
> --
> PGP Key: B157A9F0 (
http://pgp.mit.edu/ <
http://pgp.mit.edu/>)
> Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108 E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list --devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email todevel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List
Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedora...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red
Hat,http://www.redhat.com/
email:pemensik@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure