On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:kevin@scrye.com" target="_blank">kevin@scrye.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

So, my thought would be:<br>
<br>
Definitely build in rawhide. A heads up to those that have packages<br>
that build with it would be welcome.<br>
<br>
For stable releases I would suggest collecting a list of packages that<br>
BuildRequire it and see how extensive this list is, and then consult<br>
with those maintainers if they are ok with the upgrade. It may well not<br>
be worth all the work or change in stable releases.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the reply, Kevin. I&#39;ll push out an updated spec to my git repo and work with the maintainer to push a build into rawhide.</div>

<div><br></div><div>I&#39;d probably be happy if the update to asciidoc is available in rawhide (for Fedora 18).</div><div><br></div><div>I went ahead and looked into what depends on it, and it turns out there&#39;s only one package that claims a dependency on asciidoc, fawkes-devenv. That application uses asciidoc for creating man pages, so I seriously doubt that the upgrade will cause them any problems since that part of asciidoc hasn&#39;t barely been touched.</div>

<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ll proceed with the process to get it updated in rawhide (I&#39;m not a packager atm, so I&#39;m just assisting). </div><div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div> </div></div>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>

Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>