On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:25 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote:
On 09/25/2018 01:35 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora
> Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a
> little late and then only due to a drop-everything effort (thanks,
> stickster!). We have a proposal to add a fourth criterion for the
> Go/No-Go decision, beginning with F29 Final:
>
> 4. The release announcement post for Fedora Magazine is substantially complete
>
> As a reminder, these are the existing criteria:
>
> 1. No remaining blocker bugs
> 2. Release candidate compose is available
> 3. Test matrices for [milestone = Alpha, Beta, Final] are fully completed

I'm prefer to add a new milestone of 'day before release' and put it
there. I think after the 'go' some folks who would be helpful in making
the announcement have more time to devote to it. Also, it would seem sad
to me to be 'go' except for an announcement, and slip a week.

It is sad.  But it is also something we should want.  Shipping bits without telling people how to consume them (docs) or that they exist (release announcements) is essentially not shipping.  We need docs and release notes to block releases.  They are an integral part of attracting users and contributors.

regards,

bex
 

kevin



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


--
Brian (bex) Exelbierd | bexelbie@redhat.com | bex@pobox.com
Fedora Community Action & Impact Coordinator
@bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org