Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
And the fact that Bluecurve was the default for RH8 -> FC3
doesn't
mean it has to be the default till the end of time. Your arguement
doesn't stand either.
Did I say it has to be BlueCurve? Did I say it has to be any artwork
"borrowed" from RHEL? I said it should be something professional.
BlueCurve was and still is in this regard. AFAIK BlueCurve is the *only*
complete desktop package for GNOME and KDE. It's got
Qt/GTK1/GTK2/Metacity/KWM themes, icons, wallpapers and mouse pointers
for both environments. Clearlooks may be a "rewrite", but it's a 5%
rewrite. There can't be any comparison between the two.
I too think that binary drivers are a waste of developers' time.
Why should you care, is it FC's developers' time? Are they cr*p? Have a
look at ATI's, thank you.
--
Ovidiu Lixandru
linux360