On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:17:59 +0000, Jóhann wrote:
On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +0000, Jóhann wrote:
>>
>>> On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
>>> maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the
>>> ABRT maintainers to block any reports against those component that a
>>> maintainer has not responded but I also request that those components
>>> get removed from
bugzilla.redhat.com.
>> Weird idea. Not sure it's worth commenting on it. The problem with
>> maintainers not responding to some tickets can have multiple reasons.
>> Some components literally are flooded with new tickets. Hundreds.
>> Thousands.
> These packages should be examined and analysed individually and
> consequences be drawn upon, if neccessary even if they might be unpleasant
Agreed...
JBG
Agreeing doesn't fix the resource problems. For special packages, it's
obvious.
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/kernel
1374 bugs found
For others, it isn't.
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gftp
49 bugs found
But the bugzapping EOL script treats all packages equally, afaik. It would
also kill off _the single one_ major crasher ticket for a maintainer's single
package just because nobody replies in bugzilla.