On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 11:07 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
> How about just building binutils, then the compiler, then some libraries?
That would be great if it's possible. How is this going to work with
only the headers supplied in binutils and gcc?
I believe it ought to go something like
binutils < gcc < glibc < libgcc
We might want to put libgcc into a separate package for the
cross-toolchain, unless we can _fake_ the presence of glibc. We might
only really need a dummy DSO to link libgcc against; it doesn't actually
have to be glibc -- it only needs about 10 symbols to be present iirc.
--
dwmw2