On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
<stransky(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> first $SUBJ is available at:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>>>>>
>>>>> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished
(don't browse
>>>>> youtube
>>>>> ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you explain why this is important/newsworthy?
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please
ignore if
>>> you're not interested.
>>
>> Ok, I'll rephrase.
>>
>> I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different from every
>> other Firefox build that Fedora provides. Could you elaborate on the
>> change some and why it's being made?
>
> most likely to have a chance to get rid of gtk2 package which otherwise
> you would need forever installed and loaded by using FF on GNOME3
>
Unfortunately that's not entirely true unless you want to run it without
NPAPI plugin support. The recent solution links plugin-container to gtk2
libraries to run flash and so (Java is not supported because it does not
run OOP).
When flash plugin is replaced by shumway [1] we can build FF as pure
gtk3 app and emulate flash by JS.
ma.
[1]
http://mozilla.github.io/shumway/
Hi,
we have several replaces for flash plugin , but none works reasonably
I'm talking about gnash , Lightspark and other that don't remember
this shumway could really replace flash plugin ?
and if your work is based on official .spec , could you provide us the
diff (patch) that you already made for this package .
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.