On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Sahana Prasad <sahana@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,

Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.

Hi all,
FTBFS bugs have been reported for all those packages that failed to build with
OpenSSL 3.0.0. Attached list of failed packages and logs [1].

Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad

Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad


On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Sahana Prasad <sahana@redhat.com> wrote:


On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com> wrote:
On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now.
> You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now.
>
> The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them.

I have switched the following packages to OpenSSL 1.1 explicitly as they will
not support OpenSSL 3.0:

python2.7
python3.7
python3.6
pypy
pypy3.7

See an example PR for inspiration:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.6/pull-request/36

The constrict is compatible with Fedora 33-35 as well.

It is not compatible with RHELs, but if deemed necessary, we can add openssl1.1
matapackage to EPEL.

I've also requested the openssl1.1-devel provide to be added to RHEL 8, but it
might be rejected or take a long time:
 
Hi Miro,

Thanks for reporting this RFE. We have decided to provide support for it.

Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006238

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok