On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
Hello Fedora!
Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
Upon the advice of Red Hat Legal, we have slightly amended the Fedora
Licensing Guidelines
(
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines). The
following section has been added:
Subpackage Licensing
Can you elaborate the cases below?
I can't spot anything wrong with them:
[corsepiu] gtkglext: gtkglext-libs-1.2.0-10.fc12.x86_64
#
repoquery -ql 'gtkglext-libs'
...
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/COPYING.LIB
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/README
/usr/share/doc/gtkglext-libs-1.2.0/TODO
[corsepiu] OpenSceneGraph: OpenThreads-2.8.3-1.fc14.x86_64
#
repoquery -ql OpenThreads.i686
...
/usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/AUTHORS.txt
/usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/LICENSE.txt
/usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/NEWS.txt
/usr/share/doc/OpenThreads-2.8.2/README.txt
Both are cases where the binary base packages' names differ from the
srpm name.
Ralf