> I don't understand why you are on a crusade to remove stuff
> which works, even after people conceded to your desire
> to have binary logs.
>

Because that is how progress happens? Of backwards compatibility was held on forever it would be insane... Eventually things change and as Lennart pointed out Arch already does this...

> Now you are trying to push people to have ONLY binary logs.

Way to say things that aren't there... He has categorically stated the opposite of this...

You already customise Austen's fur clients right? You don't just install default fedora and run right?

Just install rsyslogd as part of that process...