Should I report the dropped improve-relatime.patch as a bug? The
mkinitrd is a whole different thing.
What I wanted was the improve-relatime.patch to be included in F10, as
it is included in F9 by default:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch
--
Ricardo Arguello
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Woehlke
<mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
>
> Why was the improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10's kernel? F9 had
> relatime on by default using this patch.
> I first thought the upstream kernel had the patch now, but
> /proc/mounts does not show relatime in F10.
>
> I found this bug, looks related:
>
> mkinitrd can't deal with the "relatime" mount option
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430280
Speaking of, this looks to be... how old? Any chance of getting it fixed?
(Especially with SSD's becoming more popular, for which it makes particular
sense to request relatime?)
I mean... if you don't know about this bug and add relatime to fstab, you've
just made it impossible to upgrade the kernel. And the work-around (edit
fstab to remove relatime, 'yum update kernel', edit fstab to put back
relatime) isn't very friendly.
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"Ethics? We've heard of it" -- Microsoft
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list