That rule did not get approved by fesco quite the opposite + FESCO members they themselves where supposed to be the ones that selected initial members for the WG but they did not do so for all groups as in the Workstation WG initial selection was conducted by Josh Boyer ( former FESCO member,board kernel and what not everybody should know him ) as well as the Base WG was selected by Phil Knirsch, which is entirely unassociated with fesco afaik but is (co)-maintaining bunch of obsoleted stuff there in the base/core OS.
On 10/27/2013 11:34 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
2013/10/27, Frank Murphy<frankly3d@gmail.com>:
>On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800Well, if I believe this ticket [1]: "Each working group should be
>Christopher Meng<cickumqt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are
>>working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical
>>base but are there any plots for other people?
comprised of no more than half (rounded up) of Red Hat employees. This
is to avoid the misconception that Red Hat is dictating the planning
here. "
That a good rule.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct