On Wednesday 30 May 2007 10:59:52 David Woodhouse wrote:
Allowing partially-failed builds to make it through into the repo
without user intervention is insane. Failures should _always_ be
investigated.
If there is nobody around for that secondary arch to investigate why the build
failed on that secondary arch, does that secondary arch need to continue
existing? It is entirely up to the community wanting to support $ARCH to be
on the hook to fix problems that arise in $ARCH. They should not just pass
that off on the package maintainer if said package maintainer isn't part of
the $ARCH movement already.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora