On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:07 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
OK, to summarize:
a) There's a whole lot of pain and not much gain messing with
package file names (and file paths and scripts and ... )
b) The dependency
Requires: cpu(cmov)
(or equivalent token) might (*will* imho) be useful identifying
packages that actually use, say, cmov.
(Note: there's more than cmov that needs marking, generalizing
the cpu(...) name space is quite straightforward.)
c) Users want a clear call on what package file name to install, as
some *.i386.rpm will not run on arch i386, very confusing.
d) linuxthreads needs to die! die! die! (but that's just me ;-)
Name your poison (if any) please.
What's going to Provide: cpu(cmov)?
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell(a)comcast.net>