On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:38 PM, seth vidal &lt;<a href="mailto:skvidal@fedoraproject.org">skvidal@fedoraproject.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
</div></div>Simo&#39;s point still holds though. What you&#39;ve described above is a better<br>
reason to have not designed nm around dbus not a reason why we should be<br>
okay with our network services going away when we restart dbus.</blockquote><div><br>If you want your operating system to be held together with shell script, duct tape, and ad-hoc use of Unix domain sockets that&#39;s cool, I&#39;d rather have a reliable and stable system.<br>
</div></div>