On 10/25/2011 11:30 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>>> It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
>>>> which were not doable before.
>> ...
>>> - mount rootfs encrypted
>>> - mount /usr not encrypted (no secrets here)
>>
>> this is already possible, I use this setup for a long time.
>
> Does not seem to make any sense to me, unless you verify that no one has
> messed with your binaries/libraries in /usr.
Does not seem to make any sense to me, unless you verify that no one has
messed with your kernel/bootloader in /boot or /dev/sda.
Which in turn requires verifying that the BIOS hasn't been tampered
with. TSA anyone?