On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:36:30 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)jdub.homelinux.org> wrote:
There is a difference in having an arbitrary timeout because
something
didn't get upstreamed and having a module be orphaned. If the
maintainer is still fighting to get it upstream and it hasn't happened
yet, I see no reason to arbitrarily tell them "too bad, you didn't
meet the timeout."
Well, I didn't want the timeout to be a flat "sod off", I wanted it to
be another review point. If they're still fighting and there is
progress, no reason not to extend it for another release. IF they've
sat on their duff and done nothing, well...
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?