Florian La Roche <laroche(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> (oh, right semantics is not your problem, you don't even do
typing/schemas
> but I'm sorry 90% of unix conf woes are semantics only).
I think this is pointing at a key item: apps apply too much
semantics
on how they read config settings. Maybe common ways could be worked out
if bigger projects would cooperate on a common lib/infrastructure for
this?
The whole idea of configuration /is/ to provide semantics.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616
counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513