On 11/14/2006 07:15 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:23 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven (arjan(a)fenrus.demon.nl) said:
>> I really like this idea; it's a simple "cat" and it can be done at
a
>> time where latency doesn't matter... (even in cron.daily)
>>
>> Oh... this opens more options. This also allows the "sort by
>> blocknumber" to be done at this point and taken out of the critical
>> latency part......
>>
>> great idea!
> Of course, that then makes shutdown take twice as long.
if you do it at shutdown, which is again a latency path :)
cron.daily/weekly is less so ;)
+1 for cron
-1 for shutdown -> what about boxens, which are shutdown only on kernel
updates? (like mine)
Regards,
Dariusz
Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com