On 05/29/2009 08:02 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
>>> in graphical installers
>>
>> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
>> because they are merged!
>> I guess there is an option for hidden groups
>>
>
> Have these packages:
>
> Provides: policy(adult content)
>
> And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
>
> Conflicts: policy(adult content)
>
> /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all
over the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
What about
policy(shows skin) ?
Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a
provides tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this
way then I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
- firefox
- yum
- sword
- gnome-sword
sword and gnome-sword could certainly get policy(religious)
firefox could have: policy(the internet is for p0rn)
and yum: policy(ad absurdium)
-Toshio