> I'm just wondering whether the name suffix is the right place to put "flatpak" as if it were a subpackage - can we use the dist tag instead, say `fi39` for "fedora immutable based on fedora 39" or something like that? Or `fp39` for `fedora flatpak ...`?

The main difference is what happens when you type firefox into koji - do you see

  firefox-112.0.2-1.fc38     [the RPM]
  firefox-112.0.2-1.flatpak     [the Flatpak]

Or do you just see the RPM build  and you have to type firefox-flatpak to see the container build? Which one is clearer? Which one is most useful? I don't honestly have a big opinion here. I'll bring this and some other naming issues up in the Fedora Flatpaks SIG next Monday.

- Owen


On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:44 AM Michael J Gruber <mjg@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Makes a lot of sense and improves the information value of the version greatly.

I'm just wondering whether the name suffix is the right place to put "flatpak" as if it were a subpackage - can we use the dist tag instead, say `fi39` for "fedora immutable based on fedora 39" or something like that? Or `fp39` for `fedora flatpak ...`?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue