Maybe now that RH is part of IBM they have changed their short sighted view of not collaborating on a better build system like OBS. As I recall back than it was already able to bootstrap on centos and fedora and build packages and the only argument against it was legacy support with mock / koji which provide a fraction of functions that OBS does (mostly things that make it easy to get new contributers like a web interface to edit spec files and webhooks not to mention that these Mass rebuilt emails could be a thing of the past).

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, 12:17 Christophe de Dinechin, <dinechin@redhat.com> wrote:


> On 29 Jan 2020, at 00:26, Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 28 January 2020 10:03:09 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> * committing to git should build the package
>>
>> Is there a reason why this wouldn't be the case?
>
> Please no. Sometimes you just fix a typo or add a comment and there's no need
> to rebuild until a next release.

This “sometimes" is the rare case. So having a “push —nobuild” would address that need.

>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org