Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com> said:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>:
> Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com> said:
>> I created feature page
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
>
> I strongly object to this "feature". /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to
> IIRC around 7th Edition, and there is NO good reason to break it. The
> "#!/usr/bin/env foo" suggested replacement has always been a hack to
> work around broken systems, not something suggested for all scripts.
What is wrong with
#!/usr/bin/env interpreter
from technical POV?
It is an unnecessary hack, since the intepreters all have standard
locations. It also adds the overhead of a second exec() call and a PATH
search (start env, let it parse its command line, then search the PATH
for the desired interpreter, then exec() the interpreter).
It also makes system scripts more fragile; for example, if somebody
installs (from source) a different version of python in /usr/local/bin,
all RPM-installed scripts in /usr/bin (that may not even work with that
version) will now use the new version with unpredictable results.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.