On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> question is why the package name is jack-audio-connection-kit? As far
> as I know the package name should be derived from the main tarball
> name.
I thought about doing that once. Jack1's and jack2's source
codes are
distributed on the same website [1], We know that JACK stands for
Jack-Audio-Connection-Kit. So there shouldn't be any confusion.
There is rule in Fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#General_Naming
In our case it's a bit odd. However, I vote to call package in the
same way as main tarball.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko