Once upon a time, Chris Adams <
cmadams@hiwaay.net> said:
> Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <
mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <
mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.
> > >
> > > Why not?
> > >
> > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use
> > > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default
> > > values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM?
> >
> > Where did I say they shouldn't?
>
> You mean other than the quoted line?
My appologies; I misread "sysrq" as "sysctl".