7:30 a.m.
Hi,
Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
in Core? Thats fine with me too.
Regards,
Hans
12:37 p.m.
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl) said:
Hi,
Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
in Core? Thats fine with me too.
I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
any maintainership/review issues.
Bill
2:21 p.m.
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl) said:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
>
> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
> in Core? Thats fine with me too.
I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
any maintainership/review issues.
It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in
Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for
something else, then I'm game.
It could really use a cleanup packaging wise though. The wireless plugin
really should be packaged seperatly.
Regards,
Hans
1:47 p.m.
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl) said:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
>> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
>>
>> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
>> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
>> in Core? Thats fine with me too.
>
> I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
> any maintainership/review issues.
>
It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in
Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for
something else, then I'm game.
It is a really low maintenance package, but I have no objections against
moving it to Extras. It's yours if you'd like to have it.
Karsten
It could really use a cleanup packaging wise though. The wireless plugin
really should be packaged seperatly.
Yes, it is easier to get a new package in Extras than it is in RHEL ;-)
Karsten
--
Karsten Hopp <karsten(a)redhat.de> GPG 1024D/70ABD02C
Fingerprint D2D4 3B6B 2DE4 464C A432 210A DFF8 A140 70AB D02C
Red Hat Deutschland, Hauptstaetter Str.58
70178 Stuttgart, Tel.+49-711-96437-0, Fax +49-711-96437-111
3:25 p.m.
Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl) said:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
>>> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
>>>
>>> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
>>> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
>>> in Core? Thats fine with me too.
>> I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
>> any maintainership/review issues.
>>
> It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in
> Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for
> something else, then I'm game.
It is a really low maintenance package, but I have no objections against
moving it to Extras. It's yours if you'd like to have it.
Ok,
I think I'll take it then, mainly because I'm currently working
(together with upstream) in getting better lm_sensors support into
gkrellm, basicly make it use libsensors (and thus obey
/etc/sensors.conf) instead of doing things itself.
You probably do not know this but I wrote an lm_sensors driver for the
uGuru chip found on Abit motherboards, so I'm getting sort of intimate
with sensors stuff.
So if you could please not upgrade gkrellm in Core anymore then I'll
create 2 packages (gkrellm & gkrellm-wireless) with a higher E-V-R and
submit them to Extras, once they are build I'll send you mail requesting
the removal of the then older versions from Core. Agreed?
This may take some time though since I'm going away on holliday for a
week next week and I doubt I'll have time for this this weekend.
Regards,
Hans
3:23 p.m.
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok,
I think I'll take it then, mainly because I'm currently working
(together with upstream) in getting better lm_sensors support into
gkrellm, basicly make it use libsensors (and thus obey
/etc/sensors.conf) instead of doing things itself.
You probably do not know this but I wrote an lm_sensors driver for the
uGuru chip found on Abit motherboards, so I'm getting sort of intimate
with sensors stuff.
So if you could please not upgrade gkrellm in Core anymore then I'll
create 2 packages (gkrellm & gkrellm-wireless) with a higher E-V-R and
submit them to Extras, once they are build I'll send you mail requesting
the removal of the then older versions from Core. Agreed?
This may take some time though since I'm going away on holliday for a
week next week and I doubt I'll have time for this this weekend.
Well I did find time for this, so here we are 2 review requests for FE,
one for gkrellm and one for gkrellm-wifi:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981
Karsten, can you take a look if I didn't screw anything up?
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
6501
days inactive
6506
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bill Nottingham -
Hans de Goede -
Karsten Hopp