Why ship mx? - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Why ship mx?

export restrictions in EULA

Spyware, smolt, yum

Jesse Keating

Wednesday, 31 January 2007 Wed, 31 Jan '07

2:16 p.m.

Does anybody see any reason why we should continue to ship mx, in any form? If not, we need to put it in the dead.package pile. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachments:

attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)

Reply

Show replies by date

Curtis Doty

Wednesday, 31 January Wed, 31 Jan

7:35 p.m.

3:16pm Jesse Keating said:

Does anybody see any reason why we should continue to ship mx, in any form? If not, we need to put it in the dead.package pile.

I've wrtitten a couple applications that make wicked use of mxDateTime to interact with external databases and systems that use goofy formats. Are there sufficient alternatives in Python 2.5? ../C

Reply

Jesse Keating

8:25 p.m.

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:35, Curtis Doty wrote:

I've wrtitten a couple applications that make wicked use of mxDateTime to interact with external databases and systems that use goofy formats. Are there sufficient alternatives in Python 2.5?

Hrm, perhaps I was speaking of the wrong app. I was thinking of mx the mail exchanger, not the python module. Disregard this message. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora

Reply

6287

days inactive

6288

days old

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Manage subscription

2 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Curtis Doty
Jesse Keating