I just announce this on fedora-maintainers list with copy to the owners concerned. All seem to be agree to rebuild their packages against this new lib but we have some questions about this : we tried to rebuild our packages (ushare and gmediaserver) for F-7 but the build system does not see the new libupnp which is in update-testing. What to do ?

When we will be ready how to push all the packages at the same time ? And how to synchronize this with livna ?

2007/6/26, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam(a)arcor.de&gt;: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:46:05 +0200 (CEST), Eric TANGUY wrote: > > > I just announce this on fedora-maintainers list with copy to the owners > > concerned. All seem to be agree to rebuild their packages against this new > > lib but we have some questions about this : > > > > we tried to rebuild our packages (ushare and gmediaserver) for F-7 but the > > build system does not see the new libupnp which is in update-testing. What > > to do ? > > Mail rel-eng and request that they tag the package accordingly. With > koji/bodhi and stable dist targets, only stable updates make it into the > buildroots by default. This is different than with the plague buildsys. > > > When we will be ready how to push all the packages at the same time ? And > > how to synchronize this with livna ? Ok for me...we can update... I don't know if it can build from a updates-testing package or wait for libupnp-devel to be stable...But it is now hardcoded... so when avaible, the package will takes around twenty eight minutes to be built ;) > Building a complete set of updates is a prerequisite to being able to push > all packages quickly. > > Livna doesn't build against updates-testing, however, so making sure that > the packages do rebuild successfully as soon as the Fedora updates are > released would be important. That is, no surprises such as API breakage > and untested rebuilds. > > Since different people push the packages, the maximum that can be done > is to keep the "broken deps" window short. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

So libupnp, ushare and gmediaserver are in -testing. vlc from livna is ready to be rebuilt as soon as libupnp will be in stable. The question is : do we wait 5 or 7 days before pushing libupnp, ushare and gmediaserver in stable or do we push their asap ?

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:34:30 -0400, Eric Tanguy (tanguy) wrote: > Author: tanguy > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/libupnp/FC-6 > %changelog > +* Wed Jun 13 2007 Eric Tanguy <eric.tanguy(a)univ-nantes.fr&gt; - 1.6.0-1 > +- Update to version 1.6.0 > + Blacklisted for now together with ushare. It breaks dependencies in several packages. Run "repoquery --whatrequires libupnp.so.2", use rpmdev-diff, announce such ABI breakage on fedora-maintainers list, and if such a version upgrade is really necessary, coordinate rebuilds appropriately. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list