7:17 a.m.
ATM we have
gstreamer-0.10.3-3
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.3-3
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.2-1
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is:
gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
(see thread
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00126.html
and for previous related messages:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-multimedia/2006-March/msg00000.html
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-multimedia/2006-March/msg00002.html
)
and gst-plugins-good-0.10.2
What is the plan for final fc5 about core and base? Are they planned
to be aligned with gnome?
Thanks
Gianluca
9:26 a.m.
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days
of
the FC5 release.
Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5?
I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with
0.3.0 due to the api change.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179960
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bdpepple(a)ameritech.net>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
9:47 a.m.
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> the FC5 release.
>
Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5?
I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with
0.3.0 due to the api change.
It was considered, but it requires the new
notification daemon, and the
new notification daemon requires libsexy which we don't ship. At the
time, it was a bit late in the development cycle to add a new package to
the distribution.
If you file a bug though, maybe we can do something. For instance, make
libsexy configure time optional or something. Hard to say at this
point.
--Ray
10:55 a.m.
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:47 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> > the FC5 release.
> >
>
> Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5?
> I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with
> 0.3.0 due to the api change.
It was considered, but it requires the new notification daemon, and the
new notification daemon requires libsexy which we don't ship. At the
time, it was a bit late in the development cycle to add a new package to
the distribution.
If you file a bug though, maybe we can do something. For instance, make
libsexy configure time optional or something. Hard to say at this
point.
Ray, thanks for the update. I glanced at the latest notification daemon
tarball, and it looks fairly straight forward to make the libsexy
dependency option. The only use of libsexy is in the theme.c file, and
it involves sexy-url-label. If I've got some time this weekend, I'll
work on a patch to make libsexy option.
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bdpepple(a)ameritech.net>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
3:22 p.m.
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
> It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is:
> gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything
that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions,
except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Thanks
Thomas
3:28 p.m.
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is:
> > gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
> I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything
that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions,
except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at
diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone
is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as
an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to
actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Jeremy
3:31 p.m.
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:28 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > > It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is:
> > > gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
> > I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> > the FC5 release.
>
> I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything
> that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions,
> except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at
diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone
is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as
an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to
actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
They (remaining 2.14 pieces) are already queued for updates.
3:34 p.m.
On 3/16/06, Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking
at
diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone
is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as
an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to
actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Thank you for giving me yet another excuse to sit on the patches to
make istanbul in Extras build on 64bit. Now that i know the new gst is
going to be updated asap... makes working on gst08 istanbul package
this weekend particularly pointless when I'll be able to finally roll
a gst 0.10 with the gst update.
-jef
4:18 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:22:13PM +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything
that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions,
except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Among other things, GStreamer was not subject to the rigorous freezes
that the rest of GNOME was. It's developed in a more independent fashion.
Hence, the difference between the 2.13.9x GNOME releases and 2.14 was
much smaller and safer, compared to the difference in GStreamer.
You know that, of course, based on the fact that you started this
thread on GNOME's release-team mailing list:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00126.html
John Thacker
9:05 a.m.
Hi Jeremy,
El jue, 16-03-2006 a las 16:28 -0500, Jeremy Katz escribió:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > > It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is:
> > > gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
> > I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> > the FC5 release.
>
> I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything
> that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions,
> except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at
diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone
is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as
an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to
actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Is this still the plan? are there going to be updates for new releases
of Gnome 2.14.x??
Cheers,
-William
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam �gratis!
Reg�strate ya - http://correo.yahoo.com.mx/
12:16 a.m.
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 09:05 -0500, William Lovaton wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
El jue, 16-03-2006 a las 16:28 -0500, Jeremy Katz escribió:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > > > It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is:
> > > > gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
> > > I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> > > the FC5 release.
> >
> > I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything
> > that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions,
> > except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
>
> Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at
> diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that
anyone
> is 100% happy with how that process went.
>
> The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as
> an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to
> actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Is this still the plan? are there going to be updates for new releases
of Gnome 2.14.x??
updates have already been pushed into fedora updates-testing repository.
Rahul
6577
days inactive
6609
days old
11 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Brian Pepple -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Jef Spaleta -
Jeremy Katz -
John Thacker -
Matthias Clasen -
Rahul Sundaram -
Ray Strode -
Thomas Vander Stichele -
William Lovaton