In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the provenpackager group. Note that removal from this group is not a "punishment" or a lack of appreciation for the work you have done. The intent of the process is to ensure contributors with distro-wide package privileges are still active and responsive. This process is done regularly at the branch point in each release. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/#_mainta... Checked 148 provenpackagers The following 23 provenpackagers have not submitted a Koji build since at least 2021-08-04 00:00:00: akurtakov codeblock iarnell ilianaw jsmith jwilson kanarip karsten law laxathom lutter mcepl nhorman notting oliver pmachata psabata ruben steve tflink till tmraz wtogami

On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 01:54:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:29 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will > > be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds > > submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you > > can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the > > provenpackager group. > > > > Note that removal from this group is not a "punishment" or a lack of > > appreciation for the work you have done. The intent of the process is > > to ensure contributors with distro-wide package privileges are still > > active and responsive. This process is done regularly at the branch > > point in each release. > > > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/#_mainta... > > > > Checked 148 provenpackagers > > The following 23 provenpackagers have not submitted a Koji build since > > at least 2021-08-04 00:00:00: > > > > akurtakov > > codeblock > > iarnell > > ilianaw > > jsmith > > jwilson > > kanarip > > karsten > > law > > laxathom > > lutter > > mcepl > > nhorman > > notting > > oliver > > pmachata > > psabata > > ruben > > steve > > tflink > > till > > tmraz > > wtogami > > So, has this actually happened? Checking a sample of these accounts > shows that all of them are still in the provenpackager group. yes, and I don't see the removed ones in provenpackager anymore. How are you checking? I removed the ones listed in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10576 > I doubt that *everyone* on the list sent an off-list email to indicate > that they still need those privileges? Nope, a bit less than 1/2 of them it looks like.

On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at > src.fedoraproject.org/user/$user. > But those group memberships are only synced if the user logs in, AFAIK? > So ... do these packagers retain provenpackager capabilities in > dist-git so long as they never log in? :) Yeah. Group memberships are refreshed there on login. But no one could use that, as if they logged in, it would refresh and not let them use provenpackager access since they are no longer in the group.