Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks Sandro
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/podofo-0.10.1/builds/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2232243
Sandro Mani manisandro@gmail.com writes:
To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Note that it's not necessary to go through the review process for multiple versions of packages like this, providing they are named correctly according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple
We don't use "compat" in the name but instead just something like podofo0.9.
To import a package like that, you just do fedpkg request-repo with the "--exception" flag. One of the SCM admins will need to approve it but I try to do that relatively often.
- J<
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>😃</div><br><br>Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Watch<div><br></div><div><br></div><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Jason Tibbitts <j@tib.bs> </div><div>Date: 16/08/2023 06:58 (GMT+02:00) </div><div>To: Sandro Mani <manisandro@gmail.com> </div><div>Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library </div><div><br></div>null null
This is now done.
Sandro
On 15.08.23 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks Sandro
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/podofo-0.10.1/builds/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2232243
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Zbyszek
On 17.12.23 17:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Hi
I've done so: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e8f9188f10
Sandro
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Bump in the new year. PTAL.
Zbyszek
On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Bump in the new year. PTAL.
Hi Zbyszek
I already took care of this: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2334737
Sandro
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Bump in the new year. PTAL.
Hi Zbyszek
I already took care of this: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2334737
Oh, I missed that. Thanks!
Zbyszek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:17:32PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Bump in the new year. PTAL.
Hi Zbyszek
I already took care of this: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2334737
Oh, I missed that. Thanks!
I submitted calibre-7.3.0-1.fc39 now.
Zbyszek
-
jani -
Jason Tibbitts -
Kevin Fenzi -
Sandro Mani -
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek