9:25 a.m.
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
changes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over
when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode.
Failures can be seen
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-failures.html
Things still needing rebuilt
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-need-rebuild.html
Regards
Mohan Boddu
_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedora...
9:34 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
changes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into redhat-rpm-config yet.
CCing Jeff on the current state.
Jakub
9:45 a.m.
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
> changes:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
>
> we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into redhat-rpm-config yet.
CCing Jeff on the current state.
After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB
issues last week, I
think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB
failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet.
I have asked that the LTO bytecode stripping change get into redhat-
rpm-config immediately though. We already know some packages have
enabled LTO and we want to make sure they don't leak the LTO bytecodes
into the distro.
jeff
2:23 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
> > changes:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
> >
> > we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
>
> I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
> but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into redhat-rpm-config yet.
>
> CCing Jeff on the current state.
(snip)
After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB issues last week, I
think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB
failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet.
Since the mass rebuild starts today (or has already started), you're
cutting it pretty close there ...
So you'll either need to postpone to F33 or request a second mass
rebuild - soon.
Can you comment on the FESCo ticket with the current status? Just to
keep us in the loop
Thanks,
Fabio
> I have asked that the LTO bytecode stripping change get into redhat-
> rpm-config immediately though. We already know some packages have
> enabled LTO and we want to make sure they don't leak the LTO bytecodes
> into the distro.
>
> jeff
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
4:38 p.m.
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > > > Per the Fedora 32
schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> > > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
> > > changes:
> > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
> > > > > we will start the
mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
> > > I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
> > but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into redhat-rpm-config yet.
> > > CCing Jeff on the current state.
(snip)
> After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB issues last week, I
> think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB
> failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet.
Since the mass rebuild starts today (or has already started), you're
cutting it pretty close there ...
So you'll either need to postpone to F33 or request a second mass
rebuild - soon.
Can you comment on the FESCo ticket with the current status? Just to
keep us in the loop
Umm, Ben and I were already discussing the situation this
morning. I
believe the page and fesco ticket both have current state (deferring to
F33).
jeff
2:36 a.m.
We are starting the mass rebuild now.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild
for
> > > > > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for
all the
> > > > > changes:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
> > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
> > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
> > > >
> > > > I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
> > > > but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into
redhat-rpm-config yet.
> > > >
> > > > CCing Jeff on the current state.
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > > After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB issues last week, I
> > > think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB
> > > failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet.
> >
> > Since the mass rebuild starts today (or has already started), you're
> > cutting it pretty close there ...
> >
> > So you'll either need to postpone to F33 or request a second mass
> > rebuild - soon.
> >
> > Can you comment on the FESCo ticket with the current status? Just to
> > keep us in the loop
> Umm, Ben and I were already discussing the situation this morning. I
> believe the page and fesco ticket both have current state (deferring to
> F33).
>
> jeff
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3:37 a.m.
Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild?
I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs.
вт, 28 янв. 2020 г. в 11:39, Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com>:
>
> We are starting the mass rebuild now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass
rebuild for
> > > > > > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32
for all the
> > > > > > changes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
> > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
> > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
> > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
> > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
> > > > > but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into
redhat-rpm-config yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > CCing Jeff on the current state.
> > >
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > > > After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB issues last week, I
> > > > think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB
> > > > failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet.
> > >
> > > Since the mass rebuild starts today (or has already started), you're
> > > cutting it pretty close there ...
> > >
> > > So you'll either need to postpone to F33 or request a second mass
> > > rebuild - soon.
> > >
> > > Can you comment on the FESCo ticket with the current status? Just to
> > > keep us in the loop
> > Umm, Ben and I were already discussing the situation this morning. I
> > believe the page and fesco ticket both have current state (deferring to
> > F33).
> >
> > jeff
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
4:24 a.m.
Hi,
On 28-01-2020 10:37, Vascom wrote:
Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild?
I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs.
I was about to ask the same thing, there are logs though, but only
from koji or mock, not from an actual build, e.g. :
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41124919
"
Result
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/daemon.py", line 1294, in
runTask
response = (handler.run(),)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/tasks.py", line 313, in run
return koji.util.call_with_argcheck(self.handler, self.params, self.opts)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/util.py", line 263, in
call_with_argcheck
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1343, in handler
h = koji.get_rpm_header(fn)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 914, in
get_rpm_header
hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(fo.fileno())
File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/site-packages/rpm/transaction.py", line 185, in
hdrFromFdno
raise rpm.error("error reading package header")
_rpm.error: error reading package header
"
I hope that these failed builds can be automatically retried (once the problem is solved)
and that as a package maintainer I do not end up having to resubmit all of these
manually?
Regards,
Hans
вт, 28 янв. 2020 г. в 11:39, Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com>:
>
> We are starting the mass rebuild now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law <law(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild
for
>>>>>> Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for
all the
>>>>>> changes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
>>>>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
>>>>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
>>>>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought the mass rebuild should be also for
>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
>>>>> but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into
redhat-rpm-config yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> CCing Jeff on the current state.
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>> After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB issues last week, I
>>>> think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB
>>>> failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet.
>>>
>>> Since the mass rebuild starts today (or has already started), you're
>>> cutting it pretty close there ...
>>>
>>> So you'll either need to postpone to F33 or request a second mass
>>> rebuild - soon.
>>>
>>> Can you comment on the FESCo ticket with the current status? Just to
>>> keep us in the loop
>> Umm, Ben and I were already discussing the situation this morning. I
>> believe the page and fesco ticket both have current state (deferring to
>> F33).
>>
>> jeff
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
9:13 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:24:44AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-01-2020 10:37, Vascom wrote:
> Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild?
> I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs.
I was about to ask the same thing, there are logs though, but only
from koji or mock, not from an actual build, e.g. :
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41124919
"
Result
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/daemon.py", line 1294, in
runTask
response = (handler.run(),)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/tasks.py", line 313, in run
return koji.util.call_with_argcheck(self.handler, self.params, self.opts)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/util.py", line 263, in
call_with_argcheck
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1343, in handler
h = koji.get_rpm_header(fn)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 914, in
get_rpm_header
hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(fo.fileno())
File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/site-packages/rpm/transaction.py", line 185, in
hdrFromFdno
raise rpm.error("error reading package header")
_rpm.error: error reading package header
"
I hope that these failed builds can be automatically retried (once the problem is
solved)
and that as a package maintainer I do not end up having to resubmit all of these
manually?
Yeah, we disabled those builders... we can resubmit the failed jobs.
kevin
9:43 a.m.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:25:50 -0500
Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
changes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
if I see right, then FPC hasn't been bootstrapped for aarch64 and
ppc64le yet
Dan
12:42 p.m.
Yes, sorry about that. I'm working on it right now. Should be done before midnight
CET.
FPC 3.2.0 was originally to come out before the end of 2019, but it still hasn't been
released. Reading the forums and the bug tracker, none of the remaining issues affect
Fedora, so I decided to go with 3.2.0-beta from the latest SVN revision. That's the
main reason for this lag. Sorry once again.
1 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:42:28 -0000
"Artur Iwicki" <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Yes, sorry about that. I'm working on it right now. Should be
done
before midnight CET.
FPC 3.2.0 was originally to come out before the end of 2019, but it
still hasn't been released. Reading the forums and the bug tracker,
none of the remaining issues affect Fedora, so I decided to go with
3.2.0-beta from the latest SVN revision. That's the main reason for
this lag. Sorry once again.
and those are all objective reasons, so no problem. Let me know if you
need some help with the ppc64le (or aarch64) parts. Worst case we could
do a limited rebuild later.
Dan
2:11 p.m.
Here's a koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64 fpmake.pp -n
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
-k"--build-id"
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS): in function `__libc_csu_init':
(.text+0x38): undefined reference to `_init'
2:19 p.m.
New subject: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:11:07 -0000
"Artur Iwicki" <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Here's a koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64 fpmake.pp -n
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
-k"--build-id"
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS): in function `__libc_csu_init':
(.text+0x38): undefined reference to `_init'
let's forward it to the arm list
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102369 has a link
to the srpm
Dan
2:21 p.m.
New subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on
aarch64
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 21:19:34 +0100
Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:11:07 -0000
"Artur Iwicki" <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Here's a koji scratch build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
>
> The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
what is the source of the bootstrap binary for aarch64?
Dan
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64 fpmake.pp
> -n
>
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
> -Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
> -k"--build-id" /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS):
> in function `__libc_csu_init': (.text+0x38): undefined reference to
> `_init'
>
> let's forward it to the arm list
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102369 has a
> link to the srpm
>
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
2:28 p.m.
New subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
If you're asking "what's the source code", then it's built using the
same source as the RPM. After going through %setup (i.e. extracting everything and
applying patches), do:
$ cd fpcsrc/
$ make all CPU_TARGET=aarch64 OS_TARGET=linux BINUTILSPREFIX=aarch64-linux-gnu-
If you're asking "where the binary comes from", then I've cross-compiled
it (as described above) on my x86_64 machine.
2:41 p.m.
New subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on
aarch64
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:28:15 -0000
"Artur Iwicki" <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
If you're asking "what's the source code", then
it's built using the
same source as the RPM. After going through %setup (i.e. extracting
everything and applying patches), do: $ cd fpcsrc/ $ make all
CPU_TARGET=aarch64 OS_TARGET=linux BINUTILSPREFIX=aarch64-linux-gnu-
If you're asking "where the binary comes from", then I've
cross-compiled it (as described above) on my x86_64 machine.
yes, the latter has been my question
Dan
4:40 p.m.
New subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
* Artur Iwicki:
If you're asking "what's the source code", then
it's built using the same source as the RPM. After going through %setup (i.e.
extracting everything and applying patches), do:
$ cd fpcsrc/
$ make all CPU_TARGET=aarch64 OS_TARGET=linux BINUTILSPREFIX=aarch64-linux-gnu-
If you're asking "where the binary comes from", then I've
cross-compiled it (as described above) on my x86_64 machine.
Was this a Debian box by chance? Or perhaps the paths are hard-coded
incorrectly in the sources? Then you will have to patch them in
fpcsrc/compiler/systems/t_linux.pas before building the cross-compiler.
The bootstrap binary contains multi-arch paths only:
/usr/local/lib/fpc/
/usr/lib/fpc/
=/lib;=/usr/lib;=/usr/X11R6/lib
=/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu
=/usr/lib
On Fedora, there should be /usr/lib64 there. Not sure why the warning
about the missing crti.o file isn't printed, though.
Thanks,
Florian
8:23 p.m.
New subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on aarch64
No, this was done on a Fedora install. But thanks for the input! I've looked into the
sources and with patched paths and rebuilt bootstrap compiler, the koji scratch build went
ok. Gonna make a commit to dist-git soon.
1:41 a.m.
New subject: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild - fpc bootstrap on
aarch64
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:23:10 -0000
"Artur Iwicki" <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
No, this was done on a Fedora install. But thanks for the input!
I've
looked into the sources and with patched paths and rebuilt bootstrap
compiler, the koji scratch build went ok. Gonna make a commit to
dist-git soon.
awesome, thanks Artur. I have updated fpc-srpm-macros and we should be
ready for the mass rebuild.
Dan
2:59 p.m.
Dan and Artur,
The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective rebuild later.
CC'ing Ben.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:11 PM Artur Iwicki <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Here's a koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
>
> The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64 fpmake.pp -n
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
-k"--build-id"
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS): in function
`__libc_csu_init':
> (.text+0x38): undefined reference to `_init'
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3:04 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500
Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com> wrote:
Dan and Artur,
The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective rebuild
later.
I don't think we can fix it before the morning tomorrow. Artur, I
suggest to do a build with the ppc64le bootstrap included and fix
aarch64 later.
Dan
>
> CC'ing Ben.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:11 PM Artur Iwicki <suve(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a koji scratch build:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
> >
> > The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64
> > fpmake.pp -n
> >
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
> > -Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
> > -k"--build-id" /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS):
> > in function `__libc_csu_init': (.text+0x38): undefined reference to
> > `_init' _______________________________________________ devel
> > mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send
> > an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of
> > Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3:12 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:06 PM Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500
Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com> wrote:
> Dan and Artur,
>
> The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
> 28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
>
> If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective rebuild
> later.
I don't think we can fix it before the morning tomorrow. Artur, I
suggest to do a build with the ppc64le bootstrap included and fix
aarch64 later.
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but won't the build just fail if
aarch64 fails? So it won't get used for the mass rebuild at all?
Fabio
> Dan
>
> >
> > CC'ing Ben.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:11 PM Artur Iwicki <suve(a)fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's a koji scratch build:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
> > >
> > > The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
> > > /builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64
> > > fpmake.pp -n
> > >
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
> > > -Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
> > > -k"--build-id" /usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS):
> > > in function `__libc_csu_init': (.text+0x38): undefined reference to
> > > `_init' _______________________________________________ devel
> > > mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send
> > > an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of
> > > Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> > > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3:17 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:12:41 +0100
Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:06 PM Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500
> Mohan Boddu <mboddu(a)bhujji.com> wrote:
>
> > Dan and Artur,
> >
> > The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
> > 28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
> >
> > If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective
> > rebuild later.
>
> I don't think we can fix it before the morning tomorrow. Artur, I
> suggest to do a build with the ppc64le bootstrap included and fix
> aarch64 later.
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but won't the build just fail if
aarch64 fails? So it won't get used for the mass rebuild at all?
it won't fail because aarch64 will be still ExcludeArch-ed, only
ppc64le would be added to the "working arches"
Dan
> Fabio
>
> > Dan
> >
> > >
> > > CC'ing Ben.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:11 PM Artur Iwicki
> > > <suve(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here's a koji scratch build:
> > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
> > > >
> > > > The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
> > > > /builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64
> > > > fpmake.pp -n
> > > >
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/aarch64-linux
> > > >
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/rtl/units/aarch64-linux
> > > > -k"--build-id" /usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS):
> > > > in function `__libc_csu_init': (.text+0x38): undefined
> > > > reference to `_init'
> > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing
> > > > list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an
> > > > email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of
> > > > Conduct:
> > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List
> > > > Archives:
> > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> > > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3:48 p.m.
I've finished the build for ppc64le (bootstrapped from a cross-compiled compiler):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41106187
It should be noted, though, that to enable ppc64le for dependent packages, the
fpc-srpm-macros package must be edited (since packages depending on fpc use the
%{fpc_arches} macro defined there).
1547
days inactive
1548
days old
24 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Artur Iwicki -
Dan Horák -
Fabio Valentini -
Florian Weimer -
Hans de Goede -
Jakub Jelinek -
Jeff Law -
Kevin Fenzi -
Mohan Boddu -
Vascom