Hi, I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branch and running make dist-srpm, but it failed due to config mismatch on CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE: Processing /home/julas/cvs/fedora/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-aarch64-fedora.config ... Error: Mismatches found in configuration files Found CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=y after generation, had CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=is not set in Source tree make[1]: *** [Makefile:145: dist-configs-check] Błąd 1 Is this expected? Is there a better way of testing patches on Fedora kernels? Thanks for the help in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1230 [2] https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark

On 2/28/21 12:00 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that >> Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. >> What I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branch and >> running make dist-srpm, but it failed due to config mismatch on >> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE: >> >> Processing >> /home/julas/cvs/fedora/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-aarch64-fedora.config >> ... Error: Mismatches found in configuration files >> Found CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=y after generation, had >> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=is not set in Source tree >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:145: dist-configs-check] Błąd 1 >> >> Is this expected? Is there a better way of testing patches on Fedora >> kernels? Thanks for the help in advance. >> >> Best regards, >> Julian >> >> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1230 >> [2] https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark > > Hi, > > the same keeps happening if I try to merge os-build into agdf5 tree or > even if I try to make srpm in the ark-latest branch. Is this normal? > > Best regards, > Julian > I found the same last week and the documentation[0] feels really unloved. I eventually resorted to rebuilding from the SRPM and apply patches there. [0] - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/kernel/build-custom-kernel/  _______________________________________________

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:32 AM Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > Am 01.03.21 um 17:37 schrieb Brandon Nielsen: >> On 2/28/21 12:00 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>> W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that >>>> Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. >>>> What I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branch and >>>> running make dist-srpm, but it failed due to config mismatch on >>>> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE: >>>> >>>> Processing >>>> /home/julas/cvs/fedora/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-aarch64-fedora.config >>>> ... Error: Mismatches found in configuration files >>>> Found CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=y after generation, had >>>> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=is not set in Source tree >>>> make[1]: *** [Makefile:145: dist-configs-check] Błąd 1 >>>> >>>> Is this expected? Is there a better way of testing patches on Fedora >>>> kernels? Thanks for the help in advance. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Julian >>>> >>>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1230 >>>> [2] https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the same keeps happening if I try to merge os-build into agdf5 tree or >>> even if I try to make srpm in the ark-latest branch. Is this normal? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Julian >>> >> >> I found the same last week and the documentation[0] feels really unloved. >> >> I eventually resorted to rebuilding from the SRPM and apply patches there. >> >> [0] - >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/kernel/build-custom-kernel/ >> _______________________________________________ > Hi, > > there is more documentation available [1], but unfortunately one gets > the error I mentioned above when trying to follow it. > Aha, I seem to have forgotten where this came from. You are actually missing a buildreq for the kernel. I believe that 'dnf install gcc-plugin-devel' will fix your issue with the config mismatch. Also, if you are working with the fedora-5.11 branch, I have included a script in redhat/fedora-dist-git-test.sh which will generate a test version of a dist-git update. While that may not be your goal, it would be worth looking at the command line there for generating a proper srpm. Thanks, Justin

W dniu 02.03.2021 o 18:10, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 02.03.2021 o 13:42, Justin Forbes pisze: >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:32 AM Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 01.03.21 um 17:37 schrieb Brandon Nielsen: >>>> On 2/28/21 12:00 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>>> W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that >>>>>> Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. >>>>>> What I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branch and >>>>>> running make dist-srpm, but it failed due to config mismatch on >>>>>> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE: >>>>>> >>>>>> Processing >>>>>> /home/julas/cvs/fedora/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-aarch64-fedora.config >>>>>> >>>>>> ... Error: Mismatches found in configuration files >>>>>> Found CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=y after generation, had >>>>>> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=is not set in Source tree >>>>>> make[1]: *** [Makefile:145: dist-configs-check] Błąd 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this expected? Is there a better way of testing patches on Fedora >>>>>> kernels? Thanks for the help in advance. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Julian >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1230 >>>>>> [2] https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> the same keeps happening if I try to merge os-build into agdf5 >>>>> tree or >>>>> even if I try to make srpm in the ark-latest branch. Is this normal? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Julian >>>>> >>>> >>>> I found the same last week and the documentation[0] feels really >>>> unloved. >>>> >>>> I eventually resorted to rebuilding from the SRPM and apply patches >>>> there. >>>> >>>> [0] - >>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/kernel/build-custom-kernel/ >>>> >>>>    _______________________________________________ >>> Hi, >>> >>> there is more documentation available [1], but unfortunately one gets >>> the error I mentioned above when trying to follow it. >>> >> >> Aha, I seem to have forgotten where this came from. You are actually >> missing a buildreq for the kernel. I believe that 'dnf install >> gcc-plugin-devel' will fix your issue with the config mismatch. Also, >> if you are working with the fedora-5.11 branch, I have included a >> script in redhat/fedora-dist-git-test.sh which will generate a test >> version of a dist-git update. While that may not be your goal, it >> would be worth looking at the command line there for generating a >> proper srpm. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin > > Thanks, 5.11 branch with s0ix patches on top went further now: > > Processing > /home/julas/cvs/fedora/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-i686-fedora.config > ... Found unset config items, please set them to an appropriate value > CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL_FORCE_MAP=n > > os-build no longer cleanly merges with agd5f s0ix branch so fixing the > above is likely the easiest option to get going. > > Best regards, > Julian I fixed it with attached patch, I can generate a SRPM now. Thanks again! Best regards, Julian

On Wednesday, 03 March 2021 at 13:53, Julian Sikorski wrote: [...] > Now that the kernels have built successfully I have another question: is > there an easy way of signing them so that secureboot can stay enabled? I > have generated a key/certificate pair as described in the docs [1] but I was > not able to figure out how to feed these to rpmbuild/mock. The kernel spec > uses two .cer files instead of .priv/.der pair, and the docs [2] are out of > date as %{pe_signing_cert} are nowhere to be found in the spec. There seems to be some documentation on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BuildingUpstreamKernel#Sign_the_kernel_for... Regards, Dominik

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:27:16 +0100 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Am 03.03.21 um 14:00 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: >> >> There seems to be some documentation on the wiki: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BuildingUpstreamKernel#Sign_the_kernel_for... >> >> Regards, >> Dominik >> > This explains how to sign a kernel build locally with make, not how > to make mock & rpbmbuild use a self-signed certificate for the RPM > package. I build a custom kernel tuned for my system from Fedora src.rpms locally using rpmbuild (older technique without mock). I then install it using dnf -C and sign it using a method similar to the above (pesign instead of sbsign). What do you gain by having the rpms signed? My thought is, if a person has the authority to run dnf to install local packages on the system, secure boot is meaningless as protection. Is it that you want the build process to sign the kernel in the rpm package with your local keys so you don't have to go through the process of signing the kernel after it is installed? If that is what you want, and you get it working, would you post the technique here.

W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: > Hi, > > I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that > Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What > I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branch and running make > dist-srpm, but it failed due to config mismatch on CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE: > > Processing > /home/julas/cvs/fedora/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-aarch64-fedora.config > ... Error: Mismatches found in configuration files > Found CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=y after generation, had > CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE=is not set in Source tree > make[1]: *** [Makefile:145: dist-configs-check] Błąd 1 > > Is this expected? Is there a better way of testing patches on Fedora > kernels? Thanks for the help in advance. > > Best regards, > Julian > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1230 > [2] https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark Hi, the same keeps happening if I try to merge os-build into agdf5 tree or even if I try to make srpm in the ark-latest branch. Is this normal?