On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 22:16 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 03:54:00PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 20:12 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > > > dns probably scales better than a cgi ....
> > >
> > > not if you have to use the ip to respond with a proper list for that
> > > country, or, failing the existence of that country's list - respond
> > > the global one.
> > The check-script to only offer working mirros is great. I'd hope that
> > also the old locations are updated with working mirrorlist files.
> that's up to other folks than me.
Ok, I'll have to ping some other people on this.
The only problem I have with updating the original mirror lists is that
the mirrors are not always out of sync. sometimes they're only out of
sync for a day or so. So fixing them would mean having to put back the
broken mirror later if it suddenly resynchronized.
Now, if I got the time I wouldn't mind putting all the mirror results in
a little database and tracking them over time. so that mirrors that are
in sync the majority of the time don't get checked as often or some such
>From their website I didn't think they have a reasonable free
The Fedora Extras package mentions a 97% accurate database for the
free version which does sound ok to me.
97% is much better than what we had before :)
Let's see if .cgi holds up or if e.g. we can use the timezone
or other items to start with sane defaults.
the code is checked into /cvs/fedora/check-mirrors if you want to see if
there are other ways of doing it.