9:42 a.m.
Greetings!
In on week, on 2018-08-14, we will reach Fedora 29 Change
Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1].
At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially
complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by
default, it must be enabled at Change Completion deadline as well.
Change tracking bug should be set to the MODIFIED state to indicate it
achieved completeness.
Incomplete and non testable Changes [3] will be reported to FESCo on
2018-Aug-23 meeting. Contingency plans for System Wide Changes in case
of serious doubts regarding Change completion, will be activated.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/ChangeSet
[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASS...
--
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
1:19 p.m.
On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 10:42 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
Greetings!
In on week, on 2018-08-14, we will reach Fedora 29 Change
Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1].
At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially
complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by
default, it must be enabled at Change Completion deadline as well.
Change tracking bug should be set to the MODIFIED state to indicate it
achieved completeness.
I'm taking a look through these and updating ones that clearly *are*
testable already to MODIFIED.
One thing I noted, it seems odd that *both* these changes appear in the
list of 'active' changes for F29:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551329
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596190
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231
surely the BINUTILS231 change supersedes the BINUTILS230 change?
Shouldn't the bugs be duped and the wiki pages cleaned up somehow?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
7:16 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 10:42 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> In on week, on 2018-08-14, we will reach Fedora 29 Change
> Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1].
>
> At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially
> complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by
> default, it must be enabled at Change Completion deadline as well.
>
> Change tracking bug should be set to the MODIFIED state to indicate it
> achieved completeness.
I'm taking a look through these and updating ones that clearly *are*
testable already to MODIFIED.
One thing I noted, it seems odd that *both* these changes appear in the
list of 'active' changes for F29:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551329
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596190
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231
surely the BINUTILS231 change supersedes the BINUTILS230 change?
Shouldn't the bugs be duped and the wiki pages cleaned up somehow?
When BINUTILS231 was accepted, we said that it'll automatically
replace BINUTILS230, if it goes in. Since it did go in, BINUTILS230
should just be closed as "replaced by BINUTILS230" to avoid confusing
users.
Zbyszek
8:03 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 2:19 PM Adam Williamson
<adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I'm taking a look through these and updating ones that clearly
*are*
testable already to MODIFIED.
You're awesome!
surely the BINUTILS231 change supersedes the BINUTILS230 change?
Shouldn't the bugs be duped and the wiki pages cleaned up somehow?
Yes, good catch. Looks like Nick Clifton closed the binutils 2.30 BZ
already and I just edited the wiki page's category so that it won't
get caught up in the scripts again.
--
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
2086
days inactive
2087
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adam Williamson -
Ben Cotton -
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek