Downgrading: fwupd x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora 1.8 M

Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveals potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade. In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 38. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F38FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F38FailsToInstall Thank you Miroslav _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveals potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade. In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 38. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F38FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F38FailsToInstall Thank you Miroslav _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \  --enablerepo=updates-testing \  $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo -- enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \  --assumeno distro-sync

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:34:14AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo -- > > enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > > --assumeno distro-sync > > I got > > Error: > Problem: package msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch requires > mvn(relaxngDatatype:relaxngDatatype), but none of the providers can be > installed > - jaxb-relaxng-datatype-2.3.5-7.fc37.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository Once msv-xsdlib is removed, jaxb-relaxng-datatype should update. > - problem with installed package msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages.

> I don't know why those are installed (I don't recognize the packages > and they aren't dependencies of anything I know I need) and just > removed them and everything was good after that. Zbyszek

On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > - problem with installed package msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages. > > > > > It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However, that > package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-* > subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the > subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any of the > other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib. I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep some subset of the subpackages. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed: Removing dependent packages:  ffmpeg-free                           x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       2.2 M  libavcodec-free                       x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       9.6 M  libavdevice-free                      x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       228 k  libavfilter-free                      x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       4.4 M  libavformat-free                      x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       2.6 M  libavutil-free                        x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       836 k  libpostproc-free                      x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       127 k  libswresample-free                    x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       152 k  libswscale-free                       x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37                         @updates       632 k On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:40 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com <mailto:ndbecker2@gmail.com>> wrote: Error:  Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64   - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64   - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository   - conflicting requests  Problem 2: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64   - conflicting requests   - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64   - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64   - problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64   - libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository   - firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 5:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl <mailto:zbyszek@in.waw.pl>> wrote: On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > >   - problem with installed package msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages. > > > > > It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However, that > package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-* > subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the > subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any of the > other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib. I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep some subset of the subpackages. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o... Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue> -- /Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it/ -- /Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows: Downgrading:  fwupd                        x86_64         1.8.10-1.fc38  fwupd-plugin-flashrom        x86_64         1.8.10-1.fc38  fwupd-plugin-modem-manager   x86_64         1.8.10-1.fc38  fwupd-plugin-uefi-capsule-data x86_64       1.8.10-1.fc38  inxi                         noarch         3.3.24-2.fc38  mock-core-configs            noarch         38.1-1.fc38

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync F36 snowflake server: Error: Problem: package python3-PyDrive-1.3.1-19.fc36.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.10.9-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-PyDrive-1.3.1-19.fc36.noarch

(as an aside, this is the cleanest upgrade I can remember this server seeing...)

F37 workstation: Error: Problem 1: package opencolorio1-1.1.1-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libyaml-cpp.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - yaml-cpp-0.6.3-7.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package opencolorio1-1.1.1-3.fc37.x86_64 Problem 2: package blender-1:3.4.1-11.fc38.x86_64 requires libembree3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package blender-1:3.4.1-2.fc37.x86_64 - embree-3.13.5-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - blender-1:3.4.1-2.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:37:55AM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got: > > Errore: Errore test di transazione: >    il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so > dell'installazione di > libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc38.x86_64 entra in conflitto con il > file > del pacchetto libheif-hevc-1.15.1-2.fc37.1.x86_64 >    il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-x265.so dell'installazione di > libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc38.x86_64 entra in conflitto con il > file > del pacchetto libheif-hevc-1.15.1-2.fc37.1.x86_64 > > I had to manually 'dnf remove libheif-hevc' to make system-upgrade > works. That seems to be a problem to be solved in rpmfusion.

>

Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue