F17 x86_64 composes - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

F17 x86_64 composes

F-17 Branched report: 20120305...

HEAD UPS : libmemcached soname...

Mike Chambers

Tuesday, 28 February 2012 Tue, 28 Feb '12

4:37 p.m.

Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso or anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile? -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best little town on Earth!"

Reply

Show replies by date

Kevin Fenzi

Tuesday, 28 February Tue, 28 Feb

11:27 p.m.

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:37:50 -0600 Mike Chambers <mike(a)miketc.net> wrote:

Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso or anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile?

Well, it's going to stay that way until the bug that prevents it working is fixed. :) It seems no one has reported the bug, so I did: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798504 kevin

Reply

Kamil Paral

Monday, 5 March Mon, 5 Mar

2:31 a.m.

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:37:50 -0600 Mike Chambers <mike(a)miketc.net> wrote: > Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no > boot.iso > or anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile? Well, it's going to stay that way until the bug that prevents it working is fixed. :) It seems no one has reported the bug, so I did: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798504 kevin

The problem continues in here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5102

Reply

Adam Williamson

Wednesday, 29 February Wed, 29 Feb

12:16 a.m.

On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:37 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:

Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso or anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile?

Is there a reason you can't use the Alpha boot.iso? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

Reply

Mike Chambers

5:01 a.m.

On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 22:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:37 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso or > anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile? Is there a reason you can't use the Alpha boot.iso?

Yes I did use it, was just inquiring cause I mirror locally usually install against it if run into problems or something. Just was checking in general. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best little town on Earth!"

Reply

4432

days inactive

4438

days old

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Manage subscription

4 comments

4 participants

tags (0)

participants (4)

Adam Williamson
Kamil Paral
Kevin Fenzi
Mike Chambers