August 2021 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1956227] New: DNF System Upgrade page links to non-existent component=dnf-plugin-system-upgrade

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956227 Bug ID: 1956227 Summary: DNF System Upgrade page links to non-existent component=dnf-plugin-system-upgrade Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: install-guide Severity: high Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: info(a)skierpage.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora (there's no Fedora Documentation component for Upgrading to a new release, or Quick Docs) Description of problem: I followed https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/, it went smoothly, well done! But under "Frequently Asked Questions - How do I report issues with the upgrade?", the step Search Bugzilla for an existing bug report. is a link to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=dnf-plugin-system-upgra... The bug list currently has one open bug 1767781 for the component dnf-plugin-system-upgrade, but this doesn't seem to be a valid component any more; it's not in the pop-up list when you enter a new bug. I'm not sure what the correct component is for dnf system-upgrade bugs: some bugs are filed against dnf, and others against dnf-plugins-extras. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Not applicable. How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Read https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/ 2. Follow the link in "Search _Bugzilla for an existing bug report_."3 3. Try to file a bug. Actual results: Only one open bug for dnf-plugin-system-upgrade, and you can't choose this Fedora component to enter a new bug. Expected results: Link should show a list of bugs with current system-update. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

5 months, 1 week

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1952656] New: F33+ "DNF System Upgrade" needs changes.

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952656 Bug ID: 1952656 Summary: F33+ "DNF System Upgrade" needs changes. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: install-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: mattison.computer(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The F33 (and newer) "DNF System Upgrade" instructions document has a couple of minor issues, and one more serious problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora-33, and probably newer. How reproducible: not applicable. Steps to Reproduce: 1. not applicable. 2. not applicable. 3. not applicable. Actual results: not applicable. Expected results: not applicable. Additional info: I. The "Clean-Up Old Packages" Section (2 minor issues). In the "Clean-Up Old Packages" section, the instructions first say to do "sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied", and then to do "sudo dnf repoquery --duplicates". After that, there is a "NOTE" box saying to first do "sudo dnf update". After the "NOTE" box, the instructions say to do "sudo dnf list extras", and so on. A. Assuming that the "NOTE" box is saying to do the "sudo dnf update" before doing the "sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied" and the "sudo dnf repoquery --duplicates", the box should be moved to between * the "Clean-Up Old Packages" section title, and * the instruction to do "sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied". So it should be: 1. The section title "Clean_Up Old Packages"; 2. The "NOTE" box for sudo dnf update"; 3. instruction to run "sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied"; 4. instruction to run "sudo dnf repoquery --duplicates"; and 5. instructions to run "sudo dnf list extras", and so on. B. According to the dnf man page, the "update" command is deprecated. It is now "upgrade". So the dnf command in the "NOTE" box discussed above should be "sudo dnf upgrade", not "sudo dnf update". II. The "Clean-Up Old Symlinks" Section (more serious problem). In the Fedora users list, in the thread "invisible application after upgrade", one member said that the "sudo symlinks -r -d /usr" step isn't necessarily a good idea. He provided an example. There was a little more discussion in the Fedora users list thread "dangling symlinks and upgrades (was "invisible application after upgrade").". This section needs to be either redone or deleted. I do not have the expertise to be more specific. I am a home user with no training as a sys.admin. I have a stand-alone home work station. I do my own systems administration. So I rely on the Fedora "DNF System Upgrade" document to guide me through semi-annual upgrades. I ask that this section be researched and either improved or deleted as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 year, 9 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1957968] New: WIFI connection with WPS-PBC not working

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957968 Bug ID: 1957968 Summary: WIFI connection with WPS-PBC not working Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: wireless-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: hk(a)hsyn.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: sradvan(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: WiFi Connection can't be established with the Fedora 34 via WPS-PBC. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OS: Fedora 34 live USB stick. Rooter: Fritz!Box 7590 v7.27 Notebook: ThinkPad w520 How reproducible: Start Fedora 34 from USB stick. Try to connect to a WPA&WPA2 Secured WiFi. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Connection can't established. Expected results: Authentication without manual key enter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 year, 10 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1997970] New: Typo on release page of a package on package.fedoraproject.org

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997970 Bug ID: 1997970 Summary: Typo on release page of a package on package.fedoraproject.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: homepage Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: eva.timbs(a)you-spam.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora When clicking on a release of a package the new site, e.g. [1], displays a back link near the top with the description "↵ Retrun to the main page of <pkg>". Note the misspelled "Return". [1] https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/kernel/kernel/fedora-rawhide.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1997353] New: fedora everything 34 checksum page broken

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997353 Bug ID: 1997353 Summary: fedora everything 34 checksum page broken Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: schartnerw(a)outlook.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Document URL: https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Everything-34-1.2-x86_64-CH... Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: when I want to download the checksum file via verify the error message page not found appears Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1993662] New: In F34 /usr/bin/X process is a wrapper of /usr/libexec/Xorg

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993662 Bug ID: 1993662 Summary: In F34 /usr/bin/X process is a wrapper of /usr/libexec/Xorg Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: sinosuse(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f34/system-administrators-gui... command "ps aux|grep /usr/bin/X" In f34, /usr/bin/X is linked to /usr/bin/Xorg, which is wrapper of /usr/libexec/Xorg. [suse@suse ~]$ ls -altr /usr/bin/X lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr 14 18:58 /usr/bin/X -> Xorg [suse@suse ~]$ ls -altr /usr/bin/Xorg -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 277 Apr 14 18:55 /usr/bin/Xorg [suse@suse ~]$ cat /usr/bin/Xorg #!/usr/bin/sh # # Execute Xorg.wrap if it exists otherwise execute Xorg directly. # This allows distros to put the suid wrapper in a separate package. basedir=/usr/libexec if [ -x "$basedir"/Xorg.wrap ]; then exec "$basedir"/Xorg.wrap "$@" else exec "$basedir"/Xorg "$@" fi Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.11-1.fc34.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: suggest to use command "ps aux|grep Xorg" Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa August 2021