Fedora 24 Beta Release Readiness Meeting, Thursday, April 28 19:00 UTC
by Jan Kurik
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for the Fedora 24 Beta
Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, April 28, 2016 19:00 UTC.
Please check the [FedoCal] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
release of Fedora 24 on Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016. Please note that this
meeting is going to be held even if the release is delayed at the
Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours earlier.
You may received this message several times, but this meeting is open
to all teams and I'll also hope this will raise awareness and more
team representatives will come to this meeting. This meeting works
best when we have representatives from all of the teams.
More information available at [RRM] link.
[FedoCal] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/3878/
[RRM] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness_Meetings
Thank you for your support and Regards, Jan
--
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
7 years, 11 months
Re: [Developer-portal] Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora
Developer Portal - asking for feedback
by Robert Mayr
Ok, I'm fine with that. I was just bringing up a question we discussed time
ago and I'm asked sometimes by L10n folks.
Thanks for confirming it.
Regards.
Robert
2016-04-22 8:35 GMT+02:00 Petr Hracek <phracek(a)redhat.com>:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I guess, developer portal should be only in English.
> Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.
>
> Regards
> Petr
>
>
> On 04/21/2016 07:54 PM, Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> the update does not include I18n.
> Using it is not on our plan - but that doesn't mean we don't want it. We
> just didn't think about it. If you want to help us with it, I will be
> more than happy to have it. But I'm not sure how it would work with all the
> content. Especially in terms of contributing.
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Robert Mayr <robyduck(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>
>> 2016-04-20 18:53 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier < <jzb(a)redhat.com>
>> jzb(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>>> On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
>>> > This might also be interesting for Docs people.
>>> >
>>> How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list
>>> problem?
>>>
>>> There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs,
>>> design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> jzb
>>> --
>>> Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
>>> jzb(a)redhat.com | <http://community.redhat.com/>
>>> http://community.redhat.com/
>>> Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Adam,
>> not sure where my reply passes and where not (I'm not subscribed to any
>> ML), but:
>>
>> Does the update also include I18n? The developer portal is somewhere in
>> between websites and Infra, so if you consider to add this too, you
>> probably need to create and push the source file to Zanata.
>> Or is this a plan for further releases?
>>
>> --
>> Robert Mayr
>> (robyduck)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Developer-portal mailing list
>> developer-portal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/developer-portal@lists.fedorap...
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adam Šamalík
> ---------------------------
> Associate Software Engineer
> Red Hat
>
>
> --
> websites mailing listwebsites@lists.fedoraproject.orghttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> --
> Petr Hracek
> Software Engineer
> Developer Experience
> Red Hat, Inc
> Mob: +420777056169
> email: phracek(a)redhat.com
>
>
7 years, 11 months
Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback
by Robert Mayr
2016-04-20 18:53 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com>:
> On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> > This might also be interesting for Docs people.
> >
> How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list
> problem?
>
> There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs,
> design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
>
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
> jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
Hi Adam,
not sure where my reply passes and where not (I'm not subscribed to any
ML), but:
Does the update also include I18n? The developer portal is somewhere in
between websites and Infra, so if you consider to add this too, you
probably need to create and push the source file to Zanata.
Or is this a plan for further releases?
--
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)
7 years, 11 months
Attention Release Notes contributors: don't push to master
by Petr Bokoc
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder: Release Notes beats on the wiki are now closed
and we've moved all content from the wiki beats pages to git. You're of
course still more than welcome to contribute, but if you do that in the
wiki now, there's a real danger that nobody will notice your beats and
they won't make it to the final document. If you don't know how to use
git and/or docbook, ask in the IRC channel (try pinging pbokoc or
randomuser) and we'll help you.
For those who can work with git/docbook, please make sure that you
contribute to branch f24, not to master. The Release Notes will be
published from f24, and the same warning applies: if you push to master,
your commits may go unnoticed and your contributions could potentially
go to waste.
Those of you who were committing to master earlier (Simon and Glen), all
of your contributions should now be included in the f24 branch. If you
want to make sure that everything you wrote till now is included, run
"git checkout f24" in your local copy of the repo, build the book with
publican, and check the book make sure that everything is in there. I
hope I didn't miss anything, but I can't rule that out. In any case,
please make sure you're on branch f24 from now on.
Cheers,
Petr
7 years, 11 months
Removing "Comb Beats and Changes Pages for Alpha" from schedule
by Jan Kurik
Hi team,
as far as I understand, the task in schedule named "Comb Beats and
Changes Pages for Alpha" is not longer needed. As such, I would like
to remove it to keep the schedule minimized.
Before I do so, I would like to check here, on this mailing list,
whether I am not mistaken :-)
So, my question is: Does the task "Comb Beats and Changes Pages for
Alpha" have still any purpose ?
Thanks for any feedback.
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
7 years, 11 months