Re: The translation of legal notice

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:18 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: The more I think about this, the more I want to save us from wasting anyone's time. I've asked Sarah Wang and Greg DeKoenigsberg to help be resolve this. Ultimately, the translation decision does not lie within the FDP. Also, we need to update the legalnotice. If you look at this: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide... versus this http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc4/errata/#sn-legalnotice You'll notice that the RHEL notice says, "All other trademarks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners." That is instead of tracking all the nuances of all the different trademarks we use. That language is lawyer-approved, and saves us much hassle. This means, once we translate the legalnotice, we won't have to again for a long time ... I hope. I'll make this change in HEAD. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/